Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033482›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2023

Are There Any Pleiotropic Benefits of Vitamin D in Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jaya K Sharma, Sono Khan, Tristin Wilson, Nathan Pilkey, Sanjana Kapuria, Angélique Roy, Michael A Adams, Rachel M Holden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaya K SharmaDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-3565
Sono KhanDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Tristin WilsonDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7580-5905
Nathan PilkeyDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Sanjana KapuriaDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Angélique RoyBracken Health Sciences Library, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Michael A AdamsDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Rachel M HoldenDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-3127
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and kidney disease are risk factors for vitamin D deficiency. Native forms of vitamin D have a lower risk of hypercalcemia than calcitriol, the active hormone. The enzyme responsible for activating native vitamin D is now known to be expressed throughout the body; therefore, native vitamin D may have clinically relevant effects in many body systems. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effect of native vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes and surrogate laboratory measures in patients with T2D and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Design: Systematic review. Setting: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in any country. Patients: Adults with T2D and DKD receiving supplementation with any form of native vitamin D (eg, ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcifediol). Measurements: Clinical outcomes and surrogate clinical and laboratory measures reported in each of the trials were included in this review. Methods: The following databases were searched from inception to January 31, 2023: Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and medRxiv. Only RCTs examining supplementation with a native vitamin D form with a control or placebo comparison group were included. We excluded studies reporting only vitamin D status or mineral metabolism parameters, without any other outcomes of clinical relevance or surrogate laboratory measures. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2). Results were synthesized in summary tables for each type of outcome with the Results: Nine publications were included, corresponding to 5 separate RCTs (377 participants total). Mean age ranged from 40 to 63. All trials administered vitamin D Limitations: Limitations include the small number of RCTs and lack of information on the use of drugs that affect measured outcomes (eg, proteinuria-lowering renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and lipid-lowering medication) in most studies. Our study is also limited by the absence of a prestudy protocol and registration. Conclusions: Native vitamin D is a safe treatment that improves vitamin D status in patients with DKD. Vitamin D may modify proteinuria and lipid metabolism in DKD, but further well-designed trials that include well-established treatments are necessary. Overall, there is limited evidence for beneficial pleiotropic effects of vitamin D in patients with DKD.

Indexed as

25-hydroxyvitamin Ddiabetesdiabetic kidney disease

Identifiers

PMID38033482
PMCPMC10683388
OpenAlexW4389090841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.