ReviewCureus2023
Complications of Epicardial Pacing Wire Removal Following Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery for Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review of Key Elements and Advancements.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Late intrathoracic migration of a retained temporary epicardial pacing wire associated with middle lobe atelectasis and hemoptysis 15 years after aortic valve replacement: a case report.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2026Article
- MRI safety in patients with abandoned temporary epicardial pacing wires: an eight-year retrospective study : Original Research Article.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Determining the Predictors of Temporary Epicardial Pacing Wires Use After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pacing wires are commonly used during cardiac surgery to monitor heart rhythm and, if necessary, provide temporary pacing. These wires are usually removed a few days after surgery, but the procedure has been associated with complications. The purpose of this study was to summarize the literature on complications related to pacing wire removal after cardiac surgery. A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Articles from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2022, were considered. The literature was then registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023418165). PROSPERO is the first database to record systematic reviews in health, and it promotes best practices around the world through broad consultation to eliminate redundancy and waste of time and money. Following that, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used to screen the data. PRISMA consists of a four-stage flow diagram and a "checklist" of 27 elements necessary for the rigorous and transparent dissemination of the systematic review's techniques and conclusions. These methods were used to ensure the integrity of the systematic review. The systematic review included six studies with a total of 18,453 patients. The most common pacing wire removal complications were retention of the wire (0.56%), arrhythmia (0.67%), delayed discharge due to delayed wire removal (0.41%), and cardiac tamponade (0.1%). The overall complication rate was 1.74%. A subgroup analysis revealed that earlier removal (within 48-72 hours of surgery) was associated with a higher incidence of bleeding, whereas later removal (after 72 hours) was associated with a higher incidence of delayed discharge. Pacing wire removal following cardiac surgery is associated with many complications, including retention of wire, arrhythmia, delayed discharge, tamponade, and death. These complications are more likely to occur with earlier or later removal of the pacing wires. Although the complication rate was lower, clinicians should be aware of these risks and take appropriate precautions when scheduling pacing wire removal. More research is needed to determine the necessity of pacing wires in cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.