Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033447›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Complications of Epicardial Pacing Wire Removal Following Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Fathima S Mubarak, Yevinka Ellepola, Kadijah Nyosha Chamba, Sanjay Agrawal, Maged Makhoul

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fathima S MubarakCardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, GBR.
Yevinka EllepolaCardiac Surgery, West China School of Medicine, Chengdu, CHN.
Kadijah Nyosha ChambaGeneral/Acute Medicine, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, GBR.
Sanjay AgrawalCardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, GBR.
Maged MakhoulCardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, GBR.
Harefield Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GBWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pacing wires are commonly used during cardiac surgery to monitor heart rhythm and, if necessary, provide temporary pacing. These wires are usually removed a few days after surgery, but the procedure has been associated with complications. The purpose of this study was to summarize the literature on complications related to pacing wire removal after cardiac surgery. A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Articles from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2022, were considered. The literature was then registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023418165). PROSPERO is the first database to record systematic reviews in health, and it promotes best practices around the world through broad consultation to eliminate redundancy and waste of time and money. Following that, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used to screen the data. PRISMA consists of a four-stage flow diagram and a "checklist" of 27 elements necessary for the rigorous and transparent dissemination of the systematic review's techniques and conclusions. These methods were used to ensure the integrity of the systematic review. The systematic review included six studies with a total of 18,453 patients. The most common pacing wire removal complications were retention of the wire (0.56%), arrhythmia (0.67%), delayed discharge due to delayed wire removal (0.41%), and cardiac tamponade (0.1%). The overall complication rate was 1.74%. A subgroup analysis revealed that earlier removal (within 48-72 hours of surgery) was associated with a higher incidence of bleeding, whereas later removal (after 72 hours) was associated with a higher incidence of delayed discharge. Pacing wire removal following cardiac surgery is associated with many complications, including retention of wire, arrhythmia, delayed discharge, tamponade, and death. These complications are more likely to occur with earlier or later removal of the pacing wires. Although the complication rate was lower, clinicians should be aware of these risks and take appropriate precautions when scheduling pacing wire removal. More research is needed to determine the necessity of pacing wires in cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

adult cardiac surgerydelayed postoperative cardiac tamponadepacing wiresretained hardwaresurgery complication

Identifiers

PMID38033447
PMCPMC10683326
OpenAlexW4388831550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.