ArticleCureus2023
Accidental Detection of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava During Central Venous Port Placement.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implantable venous access port placement in the upper arm of breast cancer patients with persistent left superior vena cava: a case series and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Venous Port implantation in persistent left superior vena cava with azygos vein variation: a case report and literature review.BMC surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare abnormality of the thoracic vein that is often detected incidentally during central venous catheter insertion. We present the case of an 85-year-old female with PLSVC that was accidentally detected during central venous port placement. The left subclavian vein was punctured using the supraclavicular approach. Intraoperative fluoroscopy showed that the guidewire had descended through the left chest, suggesting PLSVC. Intraoperative computed tomography and venography confirmed that the PLSVC drained into the coronary sinus. In this case, the PLSVC and right superior vena cava (RSVC) coexisted, with no bridging veins. The diameter of the PLSVC was extremely small compared to that of the RSVC; therefore, catheter placement in the PLSVC was avoided considering the risk of venous thromboembolism, and a catheter was placed in the RSVC. When clinicians encounter cases where the PLSVC and RSVC coexist during central venous catheter insertion, the diameter of the PLSVC should be considered when deciding whether to place the catheter in the PLSVC. If the diameter of the PLSVC is narrow, it may be safer to avoid catheter placement in the PLSVC and instead place the catheter in the RSVC, considering the risk of venous thromboembolism after catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.