Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033397›Full record

ArticleJVS-vascular science2023

The influence of electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography reconstruction into 8 or 10 cardiac phases on cardiac-pulsatility-induced motion quantification of stent grafts in the aorta.

Jaimy A Simmering, Deborah A Zagers, Robert H Geelkerken, Henny Kuipers, Gerben A Te Riet O G Scholten, Michel M P J Reijnen, Cornelis H Slump

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JVS-vascular science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaimy A SimmeringDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Deborah A ZagersDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Robert H GeelkerkenDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Henny KuipersRobotics and Mechatronics (RaM) Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Gerben A Te Riet O G ScholtenRobotics and Mechatronics (RaM) Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Michel M P J ReijnenMulti-modality Medical Imaging (M3i) Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Cornelis H SlumpRobotics and Mechatronics (RaM) Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Medisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity of Twente · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine to what extent aortic stent graft motion quantification is comparable between electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) scans with reconstructions into 8 and 10 cardiac phases on CT scanners from two different vendors. Methods: An experimental setup that induces motion of an aortic stent graft, according to a predefined aortic blood pressure wave, was placed in two CT scanners of different vendors. The stent graft motion was captured using an ECG-gated CT technique and quantified using dedicated analysis algorithms. The calculated motion amplitudes and total traveled path lengths of stent segmentations were compared between scans reconstructed into 8 and 10 phases and between the scanners, after validation with sensor measurements and repeated measurements. Results: No difference in motion amplitudes in z-direction (craniocaudal direction) was observed between the reconstructions into 8 and 10 phases (0.02 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.05 mm; Conclusions: The motion amplitudes can accurately be compared between 8 and 10 phases and between the two scanners, without differences larger than the voxel size of 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.5 mm. Clinical motion analysis results of different ECG-gated CT scans and CT scanners can be compared up to the accuracy of the CT scan.

Indexed as

AortaDynamicECG-gated computed tomographyEndovascular proceduresStent graft

Identifiers

PMID38033397
PMCPMC10682660
OpenAlexW4387124537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.