Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033290›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023

From intuition to AI: evolution of small molecule representations in drug discovery.

Miles McGibbon, Steven Shave, Jie Dong, Yumiao Gao, Douglas R Houston, Jiancong Xie, Yuedong Yang, Philippe Schwaller, Vincent Blay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The physics-AI dialogue in drug design.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miles McGibbonInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-3178
Steven ShaveInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6996-3663
Jie DongXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3324-9000
Yumiao GaoInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, United Kingdom.
Douglas R HoustonInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3469-1546
Jiancong XieKey Laboratory of Machine Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Yuedong YangKey Laboratory of Machine Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-2813
Philippe SchwallerLaboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence (LIAC), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3046-6576
Vincent BlayInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH9 3BF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-2375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within drug discovery, the goal of AI scientists and cheminformaticians is to help identify molecular starting points that will develop into safe and efficacious drugs while reducing costs, time and failure rates. To achieve this goal, it is crucial to represent molecules in a digital format that makes them machine-readable and facilitates the accurate prediction of properties that drive decision-making. Over the years, molecular representations have evolved from intuitive and human-readable formats to bespoke numerical descriptors and fingerprints, and now to learned representations that capture patterns and salient features across vast chemical spaces. Among these, sequence-based and graph-based representations of small molecules have become highly popular. However, each approach has strengths and weaknesses across dimensions such as generality, computational cost, inversibility for generative applications and interpretability, which can be critical in informing practitioners' decisions. As the drug discovery landscape evolves, opportunities for innovation continue to emerge. These include the creation of molecular representations for high-value, low-data regimes, the distillation of broader biological and chemical knowledge into novel learned representations and the modeling of up-and-coming therapeutic modalities.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryIntuitionHumansLearningartificial intelligenceautoencodersdrug discoverymachine learningSMILEStransformers

Identifiers

PMID38033290
PMCPMC10689004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.