Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033234›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023

Coarse-Graining with Equivariant Neural Networks: A Path Toward Accurate and Data-Efficient Models.

Timothy D Loose, Patrick G Sahrmann, Thomas S Qu, Gregory A Voth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mapping Still Matters: Coarse-Graining with Machine Learning Potentials.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Scaling Graph Neural Networks to Large Proteins.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Potential of Neural Network Potentials.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy D LooseDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, James Franck Institute, and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
Patrick G SahrmannDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, James Franck Institute, and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4781-9561
Thomas S QuDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, James Franck Institute, and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
Gregory A VothDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, James Franck Institute, and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-6748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning has recently entered into the mainstream of coarse-grained (CG) molecular modeling and simulation. While a variety of methods for incorporating deep learning into these models exist, many of them involve training neural networks to act directly as the CG force field. This has several benefits of which the most significant is accuracy. Neural networks can inherently incorporate multibody effects during the calculation of CG forces, and a well-trained neural network force field outperforms pairwise basis sets generated from essentially any methodology. However, this comes at a significant cost. First, these models are typically slower than pairwise force fields, even when accounting for specialized hardware, which accelerates the training and integration of such networks. The second and the focus of this paper is the need for a considerable amount of data to train such force fields. It is common to use 10s of microseconds of molecular dynamics data to train a single CG model, which approaches the point of eliminating the CG model's usefulness in the first place. As we investigate in this work, this "data-hunger" trap from neural networks for predicting molecular energies and forces can be remediated in part by incorporating equivariant convolutional operations. We demonstrate that, for CG water, networks that incorporate equivariant convolutional operations can produce functional models using data sets as small as a single frame of reference data, while networks without these operations cannot.

Identifiers

PMID38033234
PMCPMC10726966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.