Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033136›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Competitiveness analysis of fresh tomatoes in Indonesia: Turning comparative advantage into competitive advantage.

Saptana, Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya, Atika Dyah Perwita, Fadhila Dhia Malihah, Irwanda Wisnu Wardhana, Atika Dian Pitaloka, Shabrina Austin Ghaisani, Bambang Sayaka, Nyak Ilham, Elna Karmawati and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

SaptanaResearch Center for Cooperative, Corporation, and People's Economy, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8882-0596
Syahrul Ganda SukmayaFaculty of Agriculture, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4892-9663
Atika Dyah PerwitaFaculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5499-5205
Fadhila Dhia MalihahFaculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3327-2833
Irwanda Wisnu WardhanaResearch Center for Cooperative, Corporation, and People's Economy, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8803-5133
Atika Dian PitalokaMaster of Management and Business, SB IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-5495
Shabrina Austin GhaisaniFaculty of Engineering, Engineering of Management, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Bambang SayakaResearch Centre for Economics of Industry, Services, and Trade, National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-0335
Nyak IlhamResearch Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics, National Agency for Research and Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Elna KarmawatiResearch Center for Horticultural and Estate Crops, National Agency for Research and Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Mewa ArianiResearch Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics, National Agency for Research and Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8599-175X
Sri Hery SusilowatiResearch Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics, National Agency for Research and Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia.
SumaryantoResearch Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics, National Agency for Research and Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Handewi Purwati SaliemResearch Center for Behavioral and Circular Economics, National Agency for Research and Innovation, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tomato commodity ranks fifth regarding vegetable export volume and value in Indonesia. The main issues with tomato production in Indonesia are seemingly its lack of variations, quantity, quality, and supply continuity. This study aimed to analyze the comparative and the competitive advantages of tomato farming, evaluate the government policy on inputs, outputs, and input-output sectors, and formulate strategic for transforming the comparative advantage into a competitive advantage. Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) and sensitivity analysis were employed as the method with the 75 farmers as the respondents and their Focus Group Discussion (FGD) involving farmer groups, agricultural extension workers, traders, and the Agricultural Service Offices in the respective regencies. The results showed that tomato farming has both its comparative and competitive advantages. Its comparative advantage was higher than its competitive advantage in both dry and wet seasons. In general, tomato farming's comparative and competitive advantages outside Java were higher than those in Java. Meanwhile, the divergence effects of tomato agribusiness were more beneficial to consumers than producers. It indicates that improving domestic tomato production was more profitable for Indonesia than importing this commodity in terms of domestic resource use. The sensitivity analysis shows that tomato farming was relatively stable regarding productivity and price changes. The suggested strategic policies to apply are transforming tomato farming's comparative advantage into competitive advantage through productivity enhancement, improvement of distribution efficiency, less market distortion, and government incentives.

Indexed as

Solanum lycopersicumAgricultureFarmersFarmsHumansIndonesia

Identifiers

PMID38033136
PMCPMC10688876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.