Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

AddBiomechanics: Automating model scaling, inverse kinematics, and inverse dynamics from human motion data through sequential optimization.

Keenon Werling, Nicholas A Bianco, Michael Raitor, Jon Stingel, Jennifer L Hicks, Steven H Collins, Scott L Delp, C Karen Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Personalized lower-limb gait assessment method based on musculoskeletal modeling and machine learning].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Marker Data Enhancement for Markerless Motion Capture.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Keenon WerlingDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3506-7769
Nicholas A BiancoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2229-4065
Michael RaitorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jon StingelDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0007-5203-8210
Jennifer L HicksDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Steven H CollinsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
C Karen LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Technology DevelopmentP2CHD101913 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2020 to 2024
$4.1M
AddBiomechanics: Automatic Processing and Sharing of Human Movement DataR01LM014154 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Cheng-yun Karen Liu · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD101913NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creating large-scale public datasets of human motion biomechanics could unlock data-driven breakthroughs in our understanding of human motion, neuromuscular diseases, and assistive devices. However, the manual effort currently required to process motion capture data and quantify the kinematics and dynamics of movement is costly and limits the collection and sharing of large-scale biomechanical datasets. We present a method, called AddBiomechanics, to automate and standardize the quantification of human movement dynamics from motion capture data. We use linear methods followed by a non-convex bilevel optimization to scale the body segments of a musculoskeletal model, register the locations of optical markers placed on an experimental subject to the markers on a musculoskeletal model, and compute body segment kinematics given trajectories of experimental markers during a motion. We then apply a linear method followed by another non-convex optimization to find body segment masses and fine tune kinematics to minimize residual forces given corresponding trajectories of ground reaction forces. The optimization approach requires approximately 3-5 minutes to determine a subject's skeleton dimensions and motion kinematics, and less than 30 minutes of computation to also determine dynamically consistent skeleton inertia properties and fine-tuned kinematics and kinetics, compared with about one day of manual work for a human expert. We used AddBiomechanics to automatically reconstruct joint angle and torque trajectories from previously published multi-activity datasets, achieving close correspondence to expert-calculated values, marker root-mean-square errors less than 2 cm, and residual force magnitudes smaller than 2% of peak external force. Finally, we confirmed that AddBiomechanics accurately reproduced joint kinematics and kinetics from synthetic walking data with low marker error and residual loads. We have published the algorithm as an open source cloud service at AddBiomechanics.org, which is available at no cost and asks that users agree to share processed and de-identified data with the community. As of this writing, hundreds of researchers have used the prototype tool to process and share about ten thousand motion files from about one thousand experimental subjects. Reducing the barriers to processing and sharing high-quality human motion biomechanics data will enable more people to use state-of-the-art biomechanical analysis, do so at lower cost, and share larger and more accurate datasets.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMusculoskeletal SystemBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMotionWalking

Identifiers

PMID38033114
PMCPMC10688959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.