SynthesisPloS one2023
The association between bullous pemphigoid and cognitive outcomes in middle-aged and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The skin as a sentinel organ for neurodegeneration: An underrecognized target for dementia prevention.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Associations between bullous pemphigoid and comorbidities: A Swedish nationwide cohort study of 5,738 patients.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare autoimmune skin condition that causes large fluid-filled blisters on the skin, especially in older adults. BP has been linked to various diseases and medications, but its association with cognitive outcomes is unclear.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the association between BP and cognitive outcomes, such as all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia in middle-aged and older adults. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies published up to March 2023. We included studies that reported odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between BP and cognitive outcomes. We pooled the ORs, or HRs using random-effects models and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
resultsThe study selection process identified 13 studies for inclusion in the analysis, 11 studied arms of which used a case-control design and 7 studied arms of which used a cohort design. The studies were conducted primarily in Europe, with a few from Asia and the United States. The meta-analysis found that BP was associated with higher odds of all-cause dementia in middle-aged and older participants in both cohort studies(HR = 1.41,95% CI: 1.20-1.66, P = 0.000) and case-control (OR = 4.25, 95% CI, 2.73-6.61; P = 0.000). The study found no significant publication bias in the included studies. The meta-regression analyses identified some subgroups associated with significantly reported odds ratios in case-control association analysis, including Europe, BP diagnosed based on clinical, histology, immunofluorescence, and both adjustment status of NO and YES.
conclusionsOur meta-analysis suggests that BP is associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia in middle-aged and older adults. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and causal relationship between BP and cognitive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.