Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Reasons for stopping Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A retrospective study to improve future patient selection.

Anne-Cécile Ezanno, Brice Malgras, Pierre-Louis Conan, Adeline Aime, Jade Fawaz, Hugo Picchi, Solène Doat, Marc Pocard

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Cécile EzannoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0270-5090
Brice MalgrasDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
Pierre-Louis ConanDepartment of Infectiology, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
Adeline AimeDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
Jade FawazDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
Hugo PicchiDepartment of Oncology, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France.
Solène DoatDepartment of Hepato Gastro Enterology, La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Marc PocardDepartment of Digestive Surgery, La Pitié Salpetrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin · FRInserm · FRService de Santé des Armées · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the prognosis and maintain quality of life in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), a novel treatment has been introduced-pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). The majority of teams propose at least 3 PIPAC procedures. However, for many patients PIPAC is stopped after only one or two procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons for stopping PIPAC after only one or two procedures and to establish a profile of poor candidates. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all patients who underwent PIPAC in three French expert centers between 2015 and 2021. A total of 268 PIPAC procedures were performed in 89 patients. Of them, 48.3% of patients underwent fewer than three procedures: 28.1% had one, 20.2% two and 51.7% three or more PIPAC procedures. The main reason for stopping PIPAC, regardless of the number of procedures, was disease progression, in 55.8% of cases. Other reasons for stopping PIPAC were non-access to the abdominal cavity (7.9%), conversion to cytoreductive surgery (13.5%), post-PIPAC adverse events (7.9%), patients' wishes (10.1%) and death (2.2%). In univariate analysis, patients who received fewer than three PIPACs less frequently had chemotherapy beforehand (91% vs 100%, p = 0.05), less frequently had bimodal treatment (70% vs 87%, p = 0.04), had more ascites (median 80 ml vs 50 ml, p = 0.05) and more frequently had carcinomatosic ascites (48.8% vs 23.9%, p < 0.01). Performing PIPAC alone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with ascites should be avoided.

Indexed as

AerosolsAscitesPeritoneal NeoplasmsCohort StudiesHumansPatient SelectionQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesAerosols

Identifiers

PMID38033087
PMCPMC10688840
OpenAlexW4389166594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.