Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033082›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2023

Meiotic DNA breaks drive multifaceted mutagenesis in the human germ line.

Robert Hinch, Peter Donnelly, Anjali Gupta Hinch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of a master regulator Msd1 that governs meiotic entry in a global basidiomycete pathogen.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A sibling study of variation in parental mutation rates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert HinchBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3169-698X
Peter DonnellyWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-0218
Anjali Gupta HinchWellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-3418
Centre for Human Genetics · GBOpen Data Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 095552Wellcome Trust 203141Wellcome Trust 221761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination commences with hundreds of programmed DNA breaks; however, the degree to which they are accurately repaired remains poorly understood. We report that meiotic break repair is eightfold more mutagenic for single-base substitutions than was previously understood, leading to de novo mutation in one in four sperm and one in 12 eggs. Its impact on indels and structural variants is even higher, with 100- to 1300-fold increases in rates per break. We uncovered new mutational signatures and footprints relative to break sites, which implicate unexpected biochemical processes and error-prone DNA repair mechanisms, including translesion synthesis and end joining in meiotic break repair. We provide evidence that these mechanisms drive mutagenesis in human germ lines and lead to disruption of hundreds of genes genome wide.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairGenome, HumanMeiosisMutagenesisRecombination, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMutationOvumSemenTranslesion DNA Synthesis

Identifiers

PMID38033082
PMCPMC7615360
OpenAlexW4389160963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.