Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032990›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

A rapid, low-cost, and highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic based on whole-genome sequencing.

Per A Adastra, Neva C Durand, Namita Mitra, Saul Godinez Pulido, Ragini Mahajan, Alyssa Blackburn, Zane L Colaric, Joshua W M Theisen, David Weisz, Olga Dudchenko and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Recommendations for accurate genotyping of SARS-CoV-2 using amplicon-based sequencing of clinical samples.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Per A AdastraThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0253-3105
Neva C DurandThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0006-5647-2623
Namita MitraThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Saul Godinez PulidoThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Ragini MahajanThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Alyssa BlackburnThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Zane L ColaricThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Joshua W M TheisenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6267-5391
David WeiszThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Olga DudchenkoThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Andreas GnirkeThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Suhas S P RaoThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Parwinder KaurUWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-0766
Erez Lieberman AidenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Aviva Presser AidenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5445-0969
Baylor College of Medicine · USBroad Institute · USThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

MEDICAL GENETICS RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMT32GM007526 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Brendan Lee · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is key to managing the current global pandemic, as evidence shows the virus is most contagious on or before symptom onset. Here, we introduce a low-cost, high-throughput method for diagnosing and studying SARS-CoV-2 infection. Dubbed Pathogen-Oriented Low-Cost Assembly & Re-Sequencing (POLAR), this method amplifies the entirety of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. This contrasts with typical RT-PCR-based diagnostic tests, which amplify only a few loci. To achieve this goal, we combine a SARS-CoV-2 enrichment method developed by the ARTIC Network (https://artic.network/) with short-read DNA sequencing and de novo genome assembly. Using this method, we can reliably (>95% accuracy) detect SARS-CoV-2 at a concentration of 84 genome equivalents per milliliter (GE/mL). The vast majority of diagnostic methods meeting our analytical criteria that are currently authorized for use by the United States Food and Drug Administration with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Emergency Use Authorization require higher concentrations of the virus to achieve this degree of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, we can reliably assemble the SARS-CoV-2 genome in the sample, often with no gaps and perfect accuracy given sufficient viral load. The genotypic data in these genome assemblies enable the more effective analysis of disease spread than is possible with an ordinary binary diagnostic. These data can also help identify vaccine and drug targets. Finally, we show that the diagnoses obtained using POLAR of positive and negative clinical nasal mid-turbinate swab samples 100% match those obtained in a clinical diagnostic lab using the Center for Disease Control's 2019-Novel Coronavirus test. Using POLAR, a single person can manually process 192 samples over an 8-hour experiment at the cost of ~$36 per patient (as of December 7th, 2022), enabling a 24-hour turnaround with sequencing and data analysis time. We anticipate that further testing and refinement will allow greater sensitivity using this approach.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 TestingHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38032990
PMCPMC10688730
OpenAlexW4389160962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.