ArticlePloS one2023
Bacillus subtilis engineered for topical delivery of an antifungal agent.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fungal skin infections are a common condition affecting 20-25 percent of the world population. While these conditions are treatable with regular application of an antifungal medication, we sought to develop a more convenient, longer-lasting topical antifungal platform that could increase patient adherence to treatment regimens by using Bacillus subtilis, a naturally antifungal bacteria found on the skin, for drug production and delivery. In this study, we engineered B. subtilis for increased production of the antifungal lipopeptide iturin A by overexpression of the pleiotropic regulator DegQ. The engineered strain had an over 200% increase in iturin A production as detected by HPLC, accompanied by slower growth but the same terminal cell density as determined by absorbance measurements of liquid culture. In an in vitro antifungal assay, we found that despite its higher iturin A production, the engineered strain was less effective at reducing the growth of a plug of the pathogenic fungus Trichophyton mentagrophytes on an agar plate compared to the parent strain. The reduced efficacy of the engineered strain may be explained by its reduced growth rate, which highlights the need to address trade-offs between titers (e.g. measured drug production) and other figures of merit (e.g. growth rate) during metabolic engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.