Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032934›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.

I M Dushyanthi Karunathilake, Joshua P Kulasingham, Jonathan Z Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attentional Engagement with Target and Distractor Streams Predicts Speech Comprehension in Multitalker Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Neural and Behavioral Changes in Older Adults from Auditory-Cognitive Training.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural Dynamics of the Processing of Speech Features: Evidence for a Progression of Features from Acoustic to Sentential Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Isolating Neural Signatures of Conscious Speech Perception with a No-Report Sine-Wave Speech Paradigm.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I M Dushyanthi KarunathilakeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-2346
Joshua P KulasinghamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, SE 58183.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-9160
Jonathan Z SimonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-0698

Funding

Multilevel Auditory Processing of Continuous Speech, from Acoustics to LanguageR01DC019394 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SIMON, JONATHAN Z. · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural speech tracking has advanced our understanding of how our brains rapidly map an acoustic speech signal onto linguistic representations and ultimately meaning. It remains unclear, however, how speech intelligibility is related to the corresponding neural responses. Many studies addressing this question vary the level of intelligibility by manipulating the acoustic waveform, but this makes it difficult to cleanly disentangle the effects of intelligibility from underlying acoustical confounds. Here, using magnetoencephalography recordings, we study neural measures of speech intelligibility by manipulating intelligibility while keeping the acoustics strictly unchanged. Acoustically identical degraded speech stimuli (three-band noise-vocoded, ~20 s duration) are presented twice, but the second presentation is preceded by the original (nondegraded) version of the speech. This intermediate priming, which generates a "pop-out" percept, substantially improves the intelligibility of the second degraded speech passage. We investigate how intelligibility and acoustical structure affect acoustic and linguistic neural representations using multivariate temporal response functions (mTRFs). As expected, behavioral results confirm that perceived speech clarity is improved by priming. mTRFs analysis reveals that auditory (speech envelope and envelope onset) neural representations are not affected by priming but only by the acoustics of the stimuli (bottom-up driven). Critically, our findings suggest that segmentation of sounds into words emerges with better speech intelligibility, and most strongly at the later (~400 ms latency) word processing stage, in prefrontal cortex, in line with engagement of top-down mechanisms associated with priming. Taken together, our results show that word representations may provide some objective measures of speech comprehension.

Indexed as

Speech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcousticsAcoustic StimulationMagnetoencephalographyNoiseSpeechMEGneural trackingspeech intelligibilityTRFvocoded speech

Identifiers

PMID38032934
PMCPMC10710032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.