Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032853›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical investigation2024

Effectiveness of a fourth SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in previously infected individuals from Austria.

Alena Chalupka, Lukas Richter, Ali Chakeri, Ziad El-Khatib, Verena Theiler-Schwetz, Christian Trummer, Robert Krause, Peter Willeit, Bernhard Benka, John P A Ioannidis and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lessons to Be Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Some Further Ideas.International journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Alena ChalupkaInstitute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Lukas RichterInstitute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Ali ChakeriInstitute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Ziad El-KhatibInstitute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
Verena Theiler-SchwetzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Christian TrummerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Robert KrauseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Peter WilleitInstitute of Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-7159
Bernhard BenkaInstitute for Surveillance & Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Vienna, Austria.
John P A IoannidisDepartments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Population Health, Biomedical Data Science, and Statistics and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-6859
Stefan PilzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7959-1311
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety · ATMedical University of Graz · ATGraz University of Technology · ATSemmelweis University · HUStanford Health Care · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund KLI 1188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence is limited on the effectiveness of a fourth vaccine dose against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in populations with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. We estimated the risk of COVID-19 deaths and SARS-CoV-2 infections according to vaccination status in previously infected individuals in Austria.

methodsThis is a nationwide retrospective observational study. We calculated age and gender adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) of COVID-19 deaths (primary outcome) and SARS-CoV-2 infections (secondary outcome) from 1 November to 31 December 2022, primarily comparing individuals with four versus three vaccine doses. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was calculated as (1-HR) X 100.

resultsAmong 3,986,312 previously infected individuals, 281,291 (7,1%) had four and 1,545,242 (38.8%) had three vaccinations at baseline. We recorded 69 COVID-19 deaths and 89,056 SARS-CoV-2 infections. rVE for four versus three vaccine doses was -24% (95% CI: -120 to 30) against COVID-19 deaths, and 17% (95% CI: 14-19) against SARS-CoV-2 infections. This latter effect rapidly diminished over time and infection risk with four vaccinations was higher compared to less vaccinated individuals during extended follow-up until June 2023. Adjusted HR (95% CI) for all-cause mortality for four versus three vaccinations was 0.79 (0.74-0.85). DISCUSSION: In previously infected individuals, a fourth vaccination was not associated with COVID-19 death risk, but with transiently reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections and reversal of this effect in longer follow-up. All-cause mortality data suggest healthy vaccinee bias.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAustriaHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesboosterCOVID-19mortalitynationalSARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID38032853
PMCPMC11475503
OpenAlexW4389167531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.