Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032621›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2023

Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy versus treatment as usual for anxiety and depression among Latin American university students: A randomized clinical trial.

Corina Benjet, Yesica Albor, Libia Alvis-Barranco, Carlos C Contreras-Ibáñez, Gina Cuartas, Lorena Cudris-Torres, Noé González, Jacqueline Cortés-Morelos, Raúl A Gutierrez-Garcia, Maria Elena Medina-Mora and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Innovations to improve outcomes and uptake of psychotherapies for mental disorders: a state-of-the-art review.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Corina BenjetCenter for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz.
Yesica AlborCenter for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz.
Libia Alvis-BarrancoDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Popular de Cesar.
Carlos C Contreras-IbáñezDepartamento de Sociología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Gina CuartasDepartamento de la Coordinación de la Maestría en Psicología de la Salud, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.
Lorena Cudris-TorresDepartamento de Psicología, Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina.
Noé GonzálezCenter for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz.
Jacqueline Cortés-MorelosDepartamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Raúl A Gutierrez-GarciaDepartamento de Psicología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores, Universidad De La Salle Bajío, Campus Salamanca.
Maria Elena Medina-MoraCenter for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz.
Pamela PatiñoCenter for Global Mental Health, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz.ORCID 0000-0002-3715-9280
Eunice Vargas-ContrerasDepartamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Sarah M GildeaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University.
Alan E KazdinDepartment of Psychology, Yale University.
Chris J KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Precision Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital.ORCID 0000-0001-7444-2766
Alex LuedtkeDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-3236
Nancy A SampsonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University.
Maria V PetukhovaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University.
Nur Hani ZainalDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University.
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University.ORCID 0000-0003-4831-2305

Funding

Computerized detection and internet-based treatment of common mental disorders among college students in two Latin American LMICsR01MH120648 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PSYCHIATRY · PI BENJET, CORINA L., KESSLER, RONALD C · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
FIC NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUntreated mental disorders are important among low- and middle-income country (LMIC) university students in Latin America, where barriers to treatment are high. Scalable interventions are needed. This study compared transdiagnostic self-guided and guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (i-CBT) with treatment as usual (TAU) for clinically significant anxiety and depression among undergraduates in Colombia and Mexico.

method1,319 anxious, as determined by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) = 10+ and/or depressed, as determined by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) = 10+, undergraduates (mean [SD] age = 21.4 [3.2]); 78.7% female; 55.9% first-generation university student) from seven universities in Colombia and Mexico were randomized to culturally adapted versions of self-guided i-CBT (n = 439), guided i-CBT (n = 445), or treatment as usual (TAU; n = 435). All randomized participants were reassessed 3 months after randomization. The primary outcome was remission of both anxiety (GAD-7 = 0-4) and depression (PHQ-9 = 0-4). We hypothesized that remission would be higher with guided i-CBT than with the other interventions.

resultsIntent-to-treat analysis found significantly higher adjusted (for university and loss to follow-up) remission rates (ARD) among participants randomized to guided i-CBT than either self-guided i-CBT (ARD = 13.1%, χ12 = 10.4, p = .001) or TAU (ARD = 11.2%, χ12 = 8.4, p = .004), but no significant difference between self-guided i-CBT and TAU (ARD = -1.9%, χ12 = 0.2, p = .63). Per-protocol sensitivity analyses and analyses of dimensional outcomes yielded similar results.

conclusionsSignificant reductions in anxiety and depression among LMIC university students could be achieved with guided i-CBT, although further research is needed to determine which students would most likely benefit from this intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

AnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionInternetAdultCentral American PeopleFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleSouth American PeopleStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38032621
PMCPMC11078571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.