Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032539›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2023

Review of Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome, Recent Updates.

Michael Kmeid, Ioana Medrea

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Coenzyme Q10 and Autoimmune Disorders: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael KmeidDivision of Neurology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Ioana MedreaDivision of Neurology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA. medreai@upstate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe aim to present diagnostic considerations and management insights on Tolosa-Hunt syndrome. We highlight recent controversies in this field and emerging literature. RECENT

findingsThe diagnostic categorization of Tolosa-Hunt syndrome remains controversial, with imaging negative cases described in the literature and an increasing literature of secondary causes falsely diagnosed as Tolosa-Hunt syndrome. Response to steroids can fulfill diagnostic criteria, but newer management strategies are available in treatment-resistant patients, such as steroid-sparing agents or radiotherapy. Tolosa-Hunt syndrome has become controversial; the entity of granulomatous inflammation of the cavernous sinus and possible extension into orbital fissure and posterior orbit of late has been re-evaluated. Recent case series and reviews have outlined multiple false positive (neoplasm or infection) and negative (no imaging findings) diagnoses. In the future, when assessing whether a patient has this entity, we caution readers to closely follow patients for secondary causes and consider this entity in differential even if MRI is non-revealing. Additionally, biopsy should be regarded as a gold standard for diagnosis and utilized, especially in uncertain cases. The diagnostic categorization of Tolosa-Hunt syndrome may need reconsideration in future versions of the ICHD.

Indexed as

Cavernous SinusTolosa-Hunt SyndromeDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSteroidsSteroidsGranulomatous inflammatory lesion of cavernous sinusTolosa-Hunt Syndrome differential diagnosisTolosa-Hunt Syndrome epidemiologyTolosa-Hunt Syndrome management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.