Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032532›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2023

Effects of microbes in pig farms on occupational exposed persons and the environment.

Jinyi Han, Mengyu Li, Xin Li, Chuang Liu, Xiu-Ling Li, Kejun Wang, Ruimin Qiao, Feng Yang, Xuelei Han, Xin-Jian Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jinyi Han *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9148-0832
Mengyu Li *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-3777
Xin LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Chuang LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Xiu-Ling LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Kejun WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Ruimin QiaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Feng YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Xuelei Han *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. hxl014@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7957-0297
Xin-Jian Li *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. lxjlongfei@henau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2546-0145

Funding

Agricultural Breeds Research Project of Henan Province 2022020101National Kye Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1301202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In terms of pig farming, pig gut microbes have a significant effect on farmers and the farm environment. However, it is still unclear which microbial composition is more likely to contribute to this effect. This study collected a total of 136 samples, including pigs' faeces samples, farmers' faeces samples, samples from individuals who had no contact with any type of farm animal (referred to as 'non-exposed' persons), and environmental dust samples (collected from inside and outside pig houses and the farm) from two pig farms, pig farm A and pig farm B. Whereafter, 16S rRNA sequencing and taxonomic composition analysis were performed. According to the study, compared to non-exposed persons, pig farmers had a significantly higher abundance of 7 genera. In addition, the farmers were grouped according to the duration of their occupational exposure, and it was shown that 4 genera, including Turicibacter, Terrisporobacter, and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, exhibited a rise in more frequent contact with pigs. As compared to outside the pig house, the environmental dust has a greater concentration of the 3 bacteria mentioned before. Therefore, these 3 microbes can be considered as co-occurring microbes that may exist both in humans and the environment. Also, the 3 co-occurring microbes are involved in the fermentation and production of short-chain fatty acids and their effectiveness decreased as distance from the farm increased. This study shows that the 3 microbes where pig farmers co-occur with the environment come from pig farms, which provides fresh ideas for preventing the spread of microbial aerosols in pig farms and reducing pollution.

Indexed as

16S rRNADust microbesMicrobial aerosolsOccupational exposurePig farming

Identifiers

PMID38032532
PMCPMC10689614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.