Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032517›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2023

Stomach engineering: region-specific characterization of the decellularized porcine stomach.

Yusuke Shigeta, Tarek Saleh, Giada Benedetti, Lorenzo Caciolli, Jinke Chang, Elisa Zambaiti, Lei Wu, Sahira Khalaf, Wulei Song, Alessandro Filippo Pellegata and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Pill That Prints-An Ingestible Bioprinter for Non-Invasive Structured Bioink Deposition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yusuke Shigeta *Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Tarek Saleh *Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Giada BenedettiStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lorenzo CaciolliStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jinke ChangCentre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Elisa ZambaitiPaediatric Surgery, Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita, Turin, Italy.
Lei WuCentre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Sahira KhalafStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Wulei SongCentre for Biomaterials in Surgical Reconstruction and Regeneration, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Alessandro Filippo PellegataLaboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Giuseppe GiobbeStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. g.giobbe@ucl.ac.uk.
Paolo De CoppiStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Section, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. p.decoppi@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBOspedale Regina Margherita · ITPolitecnico di Milano · ITWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients affected by microgastria, severe gastroesophageal reflux, or those who have undergone subtotal gastrectomy, have commonly described reporting dumping syndromes or other symptoms that seriously impair the quality of their life. Gastric tissue engineering may offer an alternative approach to treating these pathologies. Decellularization protocols have great potential to generate novel biomaterials for large gastric defect repair. There is an urgency to define more reliable protocols to foster clinical applications of tissue-engineered decellularized gastric grafts.

methodsIn this work, we investigated the biochemical and mechanical properties of decellularized porcine stomach tissue compared to its native counterpart. Histological and immunofluorescence analyses were performed to screen the quality of decellularized samples. Quantitative analysis was also performed to assess extracellular matrix composition. At last, we investigated the mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of the decellularized tissue compared to the native.

resultsThe optimized decellularization protocol produced efficient cell removal, highlighted in the absence of native cellular nuclei. Decellularized scaffolds preserved collagen and elastin contents, with partial loss of sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Decellularized gastric tissue revealed increased elastic modulus and strain at break during mechanical tensile tests, while ultimate tensile strength was significantly reduced. HepG2 cells were seeded on the ECM, revealing matrix cytocompatibility and the ability to support cell proliferation.

conclusionOur work reports the successful generation of acellular porcine gastric tissue able to support cell viability and proliferation of human cells.

Indexed as

Dumping SyndromeGastrectomyAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell ProliferationHumansSwineBiocompatible MaterialsDecellularizationExtracellular matrixStomachTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38032517
PMCPMC10689559
OpenAlexW4389178812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.