Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032511›Full record

ArticleHerz2024

[Management of acute coronary syndrome : ESC guidelines 2023].

Maria Buske, Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Alexander Jobs, Holger Thiele

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria BuskeHerzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Hans-Josef FeistritzerHerzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Alexander JobsHerzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Holger ThieleHerzzentrum Leipzig - Universität Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland. holger.thiele@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The new guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) on the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 2023 encompass updates for both the guidelines pertaining to ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation (NSTE-ACS). The previously separated guidelines from 2017 and 2020 were therefore revised and summarized. These guidelines address various topics, including diagnostics, acute management, antithrombotic treatment, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, invasive strategies, and long-term treatment. The notable updates compared to earlier guidelines address the recommendation regarding the timing of invasive diagnostics in NSTE-ACS (Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome), the procedure of revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease and alternative regimens for antithrombotic treatment in patients with a high risk of bleeding.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCardiologyCoronary Artery DiseaseST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionFibrinolytic AgentsHumansShock, CardiogenicFibrinolytic AgentsAntithrombotic agentsCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionRevascularizationST segment elevation

Identifiers

PMID38032511
OpenAlexW4389179410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.