ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2024
Estimation error in speed of sound caused by rotation of measured cross-section from short-axis plane of blood vessels: a preliminary study.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEstimating the speed of sound (SoS) in ultrasound propagation media is important for improving the quality of B-mode images and for quantitative tissue characterization. We have been studying a method for estimating the SoS by measuring the reception time distribution of waves scattered from a scatterer at the elements in a probe. Previously, the measurement cross section was assumed to be perpendicular to the long axis of the blood vessel. In this study, we experimentally investigated the relationship between rotation angle [Formula: see text] of the probe relative to the short-axis plane of the blood vessel and the estimated SoS, [Formula: see text].
methodsWater tank and phantom experiments were conducted to investigate the characteristics of [Formula: see text] and element signals when the probe was rotated.
resultsThe received signal powers at the elements around both edges greatly decreased as [Formula: see text] increased. We introduced a parameter representing the decrease in power, [Formula: see text], in the received signal at the elements at both edges relative to the center element. [Formula: see text] was estimated to be larger as [Formula: see text] increased, especially for [Formula: see text]. [Formula: see text] also increased as [Formula: see text] increased. An approximately proportional relationship existed between the errors in [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].
conclusionBased on these results, we can distinguish between the presence and the absence of SoS misestimations using the difference in power among the elements in the received signal. In the absence of misestimation, we can obtain the true SoS, even if the target has a non-negligible size, by applying our previously proposed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.