ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2023
In-silico analysis of potent Mosquirix vaccine adjuvant leads.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorld Health Organization recommend the use of malaria vaccine, Mosquirix, as a malaria prevention strategy. However, Mosquirix has failed to reduce the global burden of malaria because of its inefficacy. The Mosquirix vaccine's modest effectiveness against malaria, 36% among kids aged 5 to 17 months who need at least four doses, fails to aid malaria eradication. Therefore, highly effective and efficacious malaria vaccines are required. The well-characterized P. falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein can be used to discover adjuvants that can increase the efficacy of Mosquirix. Therefore, the study sought to undertake an in-silico discovery of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein inhibitors with pharmacological properties on Mosquirix using hierarchical virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation.
resultsMonoclonal antibody L9, an anti-Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein molecule, was used to identify Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein inhibitors with pharmacological properties on Mosquirix during a virtual screening process in ZINCPHARMER that yielded 23 hits. After drug-likeness and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity property analysis in the SwissADME web server, only 9 of the 23 hits satisfied the requirements. The 9 compounds were docked with Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein using the PyRx software to understand their interactions. ZINC25374360 (-8.1 kcal/mol), ZINC40144754 (-8.3 kcal/mol), and ZINC71996727 (-8.9 kcal/mol) bound strongly to Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein with binding affinities of less than -8.0 kcal/mol. The stability of these molecularly docked Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein-inhibitor complexes were assessed through molecular dynamics simulation using GROMACS 2022. ZINC25374360 and ZINC71996727 formed stable complexes with Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein. They were subjected to in vitro validation for their inhibitory potential. The IC
conclusionTherefore, the two Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein inhibitors can be used as vaccine adjuvants to increase the efficacy of the existing Mosquirix vaccine. Nevertheless, additional in vivo tests, structural optimization studies, and homogenization analysis are essential to determine the anti-plasmodial action of these adjuvants in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.