Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38032472›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2024

Delivery of Neuropsychological Interventions for Adult and Older Adult Clinical Populations: An Australian Expert Working Group Clinical Guidance Paper.

Dana Wong, Kerryn Pike, Rene Stolwyk, Kelly Allott, Jennie Ponsford, Adam McKay, Wendy Longley, Pascalle Bosboom, Antoinette Hodge, Glynda Kinsella and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Dana WongSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. d.wong@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9619-1929
Kerryn PikeSchool of Psychology and Public Health & John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0474-1215
Rene StolwykSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4975-3332
Kelly Allott, Orygen, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0640-4634
Jennie PonsfordSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-125X
Adam McKaySchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0479-7681
Wendy LongleyRehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3434-8334
Pascalle BosboomMindLink Psychology, West Perth, Australia.
Antoinette HodgeThe Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-9616
Glynda KinsellaSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-0934
Loren MowszowskiFaculty of Science, School of Psychology & Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-5017
Epworth Hospital · AULa Trobe University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUGriffith University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery of neuropsychological interventions addressing the cognitive, psychological, and behavioural consequences of brain conditions is increasingly recognised as an important, if not essential, skill set for clinical neuropsychologists. It has the potential to add substantial value and impact to our role across clinical settings. However, there are numerous approaches to neuropsychological intervention, requiring different sets of skills, and with varying levels of supporting evidence across different diagnostic groups. This clinical guidance paper provides an overview of considerations and recommendations to help guide selection, delivery, and implementation of neuropsychological interventions for adults and older adults. We aimed to provide a useful source of information and guidance for clinicians, health service managers, policy-makers, educators, and researchers regarding the value and impact of such interventions. Considerations and recommendations were developed by an expert working group of neuropsychologists in Australia, based on relevant evidence and consensus opinion in consultation with members of a national clinical neuropsychology body. While the considerations and recommendations sit within the Australian context, many have international relevance. We include (i) principles important for neuropsychological intervention delivery (e.g. being based on biopsychosocial case formulation and person-centred goals); (ii) a description of clinical competencies important for effective intervention delivery; (iii) a summary of relevant evidence in three key cohorts: acquired brain injury, psychiatric disorders, and older adults, focusing on interventions with sound evidence for improving activity and participation outcomes; (iv) an overview of considerations for sustainable implementation of neuropsychological interventions as 'core business'; and finally, (v) a call to action.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNeuropsychologyAdultAgedAustraliaHumansClinical implementationClinician competenciesCognitive rehabilitationNeuropsychological intervention

Identifiers

PMID38032472
PMCPMC11607021
OpenAlexW4389179668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.