ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Comparison of the diagnostic value of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET in Breast, Ovarian, and Cervical Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Pooled it
- Head-to-head comparison of fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) radiopharmaceuticals and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT has high diagnostic efficacy in Tg-positive and Tg-negative differentiated thyroid cancer.PloS one · 2026Article
- FAPI radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear oncology and theranostics of solid tumours: are we nearer to surrounding the hallmarks of cancer?Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Mapping the knowledge landscape of the PET/MR domain: a multidimensional bibliometric analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Surgical evidence-based comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Comparing Methods to Determine Complete Response to Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the diagnostic value of [
methodsPatients pathologically diagnosed with cervical cancer and with a T stage ≤ T2a2 were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent whole-body [
resultsTwenty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty patients underwent radical hysterectomy, among which all of them underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 10 patients underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Three patients received merely laparoscopic lymphadenectomy without hysterectomy. Two patients with both [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.