Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38031649›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2023

Comparison of blood parameters according to fecal detection of

Seungmin Ha, Seogjin Kang, Mooyoung Jung, Sang Bum Kim, Han Gyu Lee, Hong-Tae Park, Jun Ho Lee, Ki Choon Choi, Jinho Park, Ui-Hyung Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seungmin HaNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5152-1979
Seogjin KangNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7838-9042
Mooyoung JungNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-6787
Sang Bum KimNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-4134
Han Gyu LeeNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-1971
Hong-Tae ParkDepartment of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3415-2339
Jun Ho LeeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8953-6413
Ki Choon ChoiNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-5097
Jinho ParkDepartment of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54596, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-5717
Ui-Hyung KimNational Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea. uhkim@korea.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-5080
Han Sang YooDepartment of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea. yoohs@snu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-0835
Rural Development Administration · KRSeoul National University · KRJeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ01567603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

objectivesTo investigate the differences in blood parameters, according to the detection of MAP using serum antibody ELISA and fecal PCR tests.

methodsWe divided 33 subclinically infected adult cattle into three groups: seronegative and fecal-positive (SNFP, n = 5), seropositive and fecal-negative (SPFN, n = 10), and seropositive and fecal-positive (SPFP, n = 18). Hematological and serum biochemical analyses were performed.

resultsAlthough the cows were clinically healthy without any manifestations, the SNFP and SPFP groups had higher platelet counts, mean platelet volumes, plateletcrit, lactate dehydrogenase levels, lactate levels, and calcium levels but lower mean corpuscular volume concentration than the SPFN group (

conclusionsThe cows with fecal-positive MAP status had different blood parameters from those with fecal-negative MAP status, although they were subclinically infected. These findings provide new insights into understanding the mechanism of MAP infection in subclinically infected cattle.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisParatuberculosisAnimalsCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleGlucoseLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexGlucoseLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexblood cellsblood chemical analysisBos taurusJohne's diseasesubclinical infection

Identifiers

PMID38031649
PMCPMC10556293
OpenAlexW4386403572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.