ArticleSleep and biological rhythms2020
Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Article in Sleep and biological rhythms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2024).World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- All You Need Is Sleep: the Effects of Sleep Apnea and Treatment Benefits in the Heart Failure Patient.Current heart failure reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This review will trace the elements of neurostimulation for obstructive sleep apnea and details on its implementation, efficacy and safety, immediate clinical outcomes, and future prospects. Methods: The literature on upper airway neurostimulation was surveyed from July, 2013, to July 2019, with a focus on the components of devices, evidence for clinical utility, and adverse events. Results: Current technology is focused on the hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS). The most long-term experience is with the Inspire Medical System (Maple Grove, MN USA) which has both FDA and European regulatory approval. Given the inclusion criteria (BMI <35, ideally <32), AHI 15-65/h, and a favorable anterior-posterior velopharyngeal collapse pattern on DISE), across many centers ~65% of patients who are intolerant to primary therapy achieve clinical success (AHI <20/h with a reduction of <50% in AHI), and more have symptomatic relief. Adverse events are generally mild, often self-limited, with occasional need for uncomplicated surgical adjustments or replacement of the implantable generator. Three other devices are in various phases of development, each with a differences in nerve electrodes, implantable components, power sources, proprietary programming, and activation patterns. Conclusions: HNS is not considered a first-line treatment option. HNS therapy, however, should be considered as one alternative therapeutic option for patients meeting the inclusion criteria when more traditional therapeutic options have been considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38031560PMC10686243W3005012894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.