Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38031453›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Machine learning classification of diagnostic accuracy in pathologists interpreting breast biopsies.

Tad T Brunyé, Kelsey Booth, Dalit Hendel, Kathleen F Kerr, Hannah Shucard, Donald L Weaver, Joann G Elmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Prior Diagnosis on Second Opinions and Pathologist Viewing Behaviors: Results from a Randomized Trial in Breast Pathology.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Characterizing Interpretive and Diagnostic Competency Development in Pathology Training.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Celebrating Eta Berner and her influence on biomedical and health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tad T BrunyéCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.
Kelsey BoothCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.
Dalit HendelCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, United States.
Kathleen F KerrDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6438-9583
Hannah ShucardDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States.
Donald L WeaverDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont and Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT 05405, United States.
Joann G ElmoreDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.

Funding

Accuracy of Breast Pathology and the Impact of Double ReadingR01CA140560 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELMORE, JOANN G, WEAVER, DONALD LEE · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
Reader Accuracy in Pathology Interpretation and Diagnosis: Perception and Cognition (RAPID-PC)R01CA225585 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ELMORE, JOANN G, WEAVER, DONALD LEE · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Digital Pathology_Accuracy Viewing Behavior and Image CharacterizationR01CA172343 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHAPIRO, LINDA, WEAVER, DONALD LEE · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140560NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172343NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225585NIH HHS R01 CA225585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explores the feasibility of using machine learning to predict accurate versus inaccurate diagnoses made by pathologists based on their spatiotemporal viewing behavior when evaluating digital breast biopsy images. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study gathered data from 140 pathologists of varying experience levels who each reviewed a set of 14 digital whole slide images of breast biopsy tissue. Pathologists' viewing behavior, including zooming and panning actions, was recorded during image evaluation. A total of 30 features were extracted from the viewing behavior data, and 4 machine learning algorithms were used to build classifiers for predicting diagnostic accuracy.

resultsThe Random Forest classifier demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving a test accuracy of 0.81 and area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.86. Features related to attention distribution and focus on critical regions of interest were found to be important predictors of diagnostic accuracy. Further including case-level and pathologist-level information incrementally improved classifier performance. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that pathologists' viewing behavior during digital image evaluation can be leveraged to predict diagnostic accuracy, affording automated feedback and decision support systems based on viewing behavior to aid in training and, ultimately, clinical practice. They also carry implications for basic research examining the interplay between perception, thought, and action in diagnostic decision-making.

conclusionThe classifiers developed herein have potential applications in training and clinical settings to provide timely feedback and support to pathologists during diagnostic decision-making. Further research could explore the generalizability of these findings to other medical domains and varied levels of expertise.

Indexed as

BreastPathologistsAlgorithmsBiopsyHumansMachine Learningbreast pathologydiagnostic accuracydiagnostic decision-makingmachine learningmedical educationmedical image interpretationmedical residency training

Identifiers

PMID38031453
PMCPMC10873842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.