Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38031172›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Young patients' involvement in a composite endpoint method development on acceptability for paediatric oral dosage forms.

Sibylle Reidemeister, Begonya Nafria Escalera, Daniel Marín, Jan Balayla, Ingrid Klingmann, Viviane Klingmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sibylle ReidemeisterGlobal Drug Development, Novartis Pharma AG, WSJ-188 10 001, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Begonya Nafria EscaleraKIDS Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-56, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Daniel MarínKIDS Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-56, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Jan BalaylaKIDS Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-56, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Ingrid KlingmannPharmaplex Bv, Avenue Saint-Hubert 51, 1970, Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium.
Viviane KlingmannDepartment of General Pediatrics, Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, University Children's Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Viviane.Klingmann@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn line with the European Paediatric Regulation, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) asks for investigation of a medicine's acceptability in paediatric medicines development. A standardised acceptability testing method combining the outcome of "swallowability" and "palatability" assessments to a "composite endpoint on acceptability" was recently developed. Before this method's suitability for selection of the most acceptable drug formulation of a new medicine for children can be broadly recommended, the acceptance and relevance of such established acceptability needs the critical review and input from young patients with understanding of the medicines development methodology. The benefit of involving patients in drug product development, clinical research and innovation is well established.

methodsDuring a focus group meeting with the KIDS Barcelona (young people advisory group, age 16-23 years) the suitability of the "composite endpoint on acceptability" methodology was assessed. Via electronic questionnaires the importance of involving patients in the medicines development and in the acceptability method development was investigated. Questions on how best to determine palatability and swallowability were asked. The relevance of all EMA-listed acceptability elements was assessed via coloured and numbered stickers and questionnaires.

resultsThe results showed that the involvement of young people in the medicines and acceptability method development was rated high. The group worked out that a 5-point smiley Likert Scale is preferred for assessing acceptability by 6-11 year old patients, while a Visual Analogue Scale is preferred for collecting adolescents' opinion. The ranking of the EMA-listed acceptability elements showed that palatability and swallowability are the most relevant parameters, while colour of the medicine was rated as least relevant. These results, established face-to-face, were confirmed in a repeat of the ranking through an electronic questionnaire, completed by the participants individually and remotely, 5 weeks later.

conclusionThis work reinforced the need and value to involve young people in the medicines lifecycle, and specifically in this acceptability method development. As next step other focus group meetings with more young people from different European countries are planned.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityComposite endpoint on acceptabilityMethod developmentPaediatric drug developmentPalatabilityPatient involvementSwallowabilityYPAG

Identifiers

PMID38031172
PMCPMC10688476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.