Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38031033›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Impacts of different culture times on pregnancy outcomes after thawing of cleavage stage embryos.

Jieyou Wang, Linna Ma, Jiaoqi Mei, Linjiang Li, Wen Xu, Weimin Jiang, Yueyan Wei, Yu Xu, Shaoqing Sun, Yanlin Ma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jieyou Wang *Hainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Linna Ma *Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory for Human Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Research, Hainan Clinical Research Center for Thalassemia, Haikou Key Laboratory for Preservation of Human Genetic Resource, Reproductive Medical Center, National Center for International Research "China-Myanmar Joint Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Regional Major Disease", The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102, China.
Jiaoqi MeiHainan Provincial Key Laboratory for Human Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Research, Hainan Clinical Research Center for Thalassemia, Haikou Key Laboratory for Preservation of Human Genetic Resource, Reproductive Medical Center, National Center for International Research "China-Myanmar Joint Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Regional Major Disease", The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102, China.
Linjiang LiHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Wen XuHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Weimin JiangHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Yueyan WeiHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Yu XuHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Shaoqing SunHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China.
Yanlin MaHainan Provincial Key Laboratory for Human Reproductive Medicine and Genetic Research, Hainan Clinical Research Center for Thalassemia, Haikou Key Laboratory for Preservation of Human Genetic Resource, Reproductive Medical Center, National Center for International Research "China-Myanmar Joint Research Center for Prevention and Treatment of Regional Major Disease", The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570102, China. mayanlinma@hotmail.com.
Qi LiHainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, 18 Qiongzhou Road, Haikou, 570100, China. 1315286326@qq.com.
Hainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital · CNHainan Medical University · CN

Funding

Yanlin Ma ZDKJ2021037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assessed the impacts of in vitro culture times of cleavage embryos on clinical pregnancy outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed at the Reproductive Medicine Department of Hainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital in China between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients who first underwent frozen embryo transfer with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles on day 3 were included. According to the time of embryo culture after thawing, the embryos were divided into long-term culture group(18-20 h) and short-term culture group (2-4 h). The clinical pregnancy rate was regarded as he primary outcome. To minimize confounding factors and reduce selection bias, the propensity score matching was used to balance the effects of known confounding factors and to reduce selection bias. Stratified analyses and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors affecting the clinical pregnancy outcomes after matching.

resultsGeneral characteristics between two groups were comparable after matching. In the long-term culture group, 266/381 (69.81%) embryos had more than 10 blastomeres, and 75/381 (19.68%) reached the morula stage. After overnight culture, the implantation rate (27.97% vs. 14.28%, P = 0.018) and clinical pregnancy rate (38.46% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.05) were increased in the group with proliferating blastomeres. The long-term culture group trended to have a higher clinical pregnancy rate compared with the short-term culture group (35.74% vs. 29.79%). No statistical differences in clinical pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were observed after matching, including the rates of implantation (25.46% vs23.98%), miscarriages (25% vs. 22.85%), ongoing pregnancy rate (76.2% vs. 77.15%) and live birth rate (26.8% vs. 22.98%). Stratified analyses were performed according to the age of the patients. After matching, there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates between the two groups for patients > 35 or ≤ 35 years of age. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the quality of the transferred embryos. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes, between two groups after embryos transferred with the same quality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors of clinical pregnancy outcomes after matching. Culture time was not found to be an independent predictor for clinical pregnancy [OR 0.742, 95%CI 0.487 ~ 1.13; P = 0.165]. The age of oocyte retrieval [OR 0.906, 95%CI 0.865 ~ 0.949; P <0.001] and the number of high-quality embryos transferred [OR 1.787, 95%CI 1.256 ~ 2.543; P = 0.001] were independent factors affecting clinical pregnancy outcomes.

conclusionsIn vitro 18-20 h culture of embryos with either good-or non-good-quality will not adversely affect the clinical pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousPregnancy OutcomeChildEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSemenCleavage embryosCulture timesFrozen-thawed embryo transferPregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38031033
PMCPMC10685551
OpenAlexW4389152432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.