Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38031021›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Health professionals' perceptions of patient safety competencies: psychometric properties of the French version of the H-PEPSS in France and Switzerland.

Sylvain Boloré, Laurent Sovet, Nicolas Guirimand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sylvain BoloréSchool of Health Sciences, Geneva, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Sylvain Boloré, 47, Avenue de Champel, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. sylvain.bolore@hesge.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-5060
Laurent SovetUniversité Paris Cité and Univ Gustave Eiffel, LaPEA, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-3115
Nicolas GuirimandInterdisciplinary Education and Training Research Centre (CIRNEF), University of Rouen Normandy, Rouen, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8674-1752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral initiatives have been implemented to develop, manage, and assess patient safety (PS) competencies, which are considered as a serious public health issue across the world. The Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS) is widely used as a psychometric scale for evaluating perceived PS competencies but has not been validated in French. The purpose of the study was to investigate the main psychometric properties of the French version of the H-PEPSS.

methodsA total of 449 students enrolled in nursing and physiotherapy schools in France and French-speaking Switzerland completed a self-administered questionnaire. The 38 items of the H-PEPSS were translated into French following a committee approach. The scale's construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability of the six factors of the H-PEPSS was evaluated using Cronbach α and McDonald's ω. Measurement invariance across countries and academic majors as well as discriminant validity were also investigated.

resultsAfter we removed one item, the H-PEPSS 6-factor model demonstrated adequate goodness-of-fit statistics (χ

conclusionPerceived PS competencies can be assessed and fairly compared across France and Switzerland and across nursing and physiotherapy students. We discuss the relevance of the introduction of the H-PEPSS in the training pathway of health professions degree courses and the fallout in clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyFranceHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandCompetenciesCurriculumEvaluation, PsychometricsMultiprofessionalPatient Safety

Identifiers

PMID38031021
PMCPMC10688088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.