Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38031008›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

The safety of patient management in family medicine in Slovenia during Covid-19: a cross-sectional study.

Maja Cvetko Gomezelj, Špela Miroševič, Alina Verdnik Tajki, Ksenija Tušek Bunc, Esther Van Poel, Sara Willems, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maja Cvetko GomezeljDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. maja.cvetko@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5635-4447
Špela MiroševičDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Alina Verdnik TajkiDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Ksenija Tušek BuncDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Zalika Klemenc-KetišDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Ljubljana · SIGhent University · BEUniversity of Maribor · SI

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS MR-39262Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P3-0339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the Covid-19 pandemic, family medicine practices (FMPs) changed to improve safety against new coronavirus infections for both patients and employees. Protocols for treating patients with suspected Sars-Cov-2 infections were established to protect medical staff and other patients from being infected. However, these protocols also led to increased safety risks, such as delays in treating patients with other medical conditions. This exploratory study aimed to investigate safety risks in treating patients in FMPs during the Covid-19 pandemic and to suggest improvements to prevent Covid-19 in FMPs in Slovenia.

methodsA cross-sectional study was rolled out in FMPs in Slovenia as part of the international Pricov-19 study. Data collection on safety management during the Covid-19 pandemic in FMPs in Slovenia took place from November 2020 until January 2021 using a self-administered online survey for FP working in Slovenia. A chi-square test, ANOVA, independent samples t-test or bivariate correlation test was performed to explore associations regarding the safety of patients' management variables.

resultsFrom the 191 participating family physicians (FPs) (15.2% response rate), 54.8% reported having treated patients with fever (not Covid-19) late due to the new protocols at least once, and 54.8% reported patients with urgent conditions having been seen late at least once due to not coming. In the suburbs and rural environments FPs more often reported that at least once patient with a fever (not Covid-19) was seen late due to the protocol (p = 0.017) and more often reported that at least once patient with an urgent condition was seen late due to not coming to their FP (p = 0.017). The larger the practice, the more they reported that at least once a patient with fever (not Covid-19) was seen late due to the protocol (p = 0.012) and the more they reported at least once a patient with an urgent condition was seen late due to not coming to their FP (p = 0.012).

conclusionCovid-19 affected the safety of patient management in FMP in Slovenia. The most common problem was foregone care. Therefor, protocols for chronic patient management in the event of epidemics need to be established.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFeverHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SloveniaSuccinimides2-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-methylsuccinimideSuccinimidesCovid-19, Family medicine, Patient safety, Patient managementGeneral practicePRICOV-19Primary health careQuality of careTimeliness

Identifiers

PMID38031008
PMCPMC10687777
OpenAlexW4389132402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.