Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38030979›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2023

Machine-learning vs. logistic regression for preoperative prediction of medical morbidity after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty-a comparative study.

Christian Michelsen, Christoffer C Jørgensen, Mathias Heltberg, Mogens H Jensen, Alessandra Lucchetti, Pelle B Petersen, Troels Petersen, Henrik Kehlet, Center for Fast-track Hip Knee Replacement Collaborative group, Frank Madsen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Christian MichelsenThe Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoffer C JørgensenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital of Northern Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29 3400, Hillerød, Denmark. christoffer.calov.joergensen@regionh.dk.
Mathias HeltbergThe Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mogens H JensenThe Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alessandra LucchettiThe Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pelle B PetersenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital of Northern Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29 3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
Troels PetersenThe Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik KehletThe Centre for Fast-Track Hip and Knee Replacement, 7621, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Fast-track Hip Knee Replacement Collaborative group
Frank Madsen
Torben B Hansen
Kirill Gromov
Thomas Jakobsen
Claus Varnum
Soren Overgaard
Mikkel Rathsach
Lars Hansen

Funding

The Lundbeck Foundation R25-A2702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine-learning models may improve prediction of length of stay (LOS) and morbidity after surgery. However, few studies include fast-track programs, and most rely on administrative coding with limited follow-up and information on perioperative care. This study investigates potential benefits of a machine-learning model for prediction of postoperative morbidity in fast-track total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA).

methodsCohort study in consecutive unselected primary THA/TKA between 2014-2017 from seven Danish centers with established fast-track protocols. Preoperative comorbidity and prescribed medication were recorded prospectively and information on length of stay and readmissions was obtained through the Danish National Patient Registry and medical records. We used a machine-learning model (Boosted Decision Trees) based on boosted decision trees with 33 preoperative variables for predicting "medical" morbidity leading to LOS > 4 days or 90-days readmissions and compared to a logistical regression model based on the same variables. We also evaluated two parsimonious models, using the ten most important variables in the full machine-learning and logistic regression models. Data collected between 2014-2016 (n:18,013) was used for model training and data from 2017 (n:3913) was used for testing. Model performances were analyzed using precision, area under receiver operating (AUROC) and precision recall curves (AUPRC), as well as the Mathews Correlation Coefficient. Variable importance was analyzed using Shapley Additive Explanations values.

resultsUsing a threshold of 20% "risk-patients" (n:782), precision, AUROC and AUPRC were 13.6%, 76.3% and 15.5% vs. 12.4%, 74.7% and 15.6% for the machine-learning and logistic regression model, respectively. The parsimonious machine-learning model performed better than the full logistic regression model. Of the top ten variables, eight were shared between the machine-learning and logistic regression models, but with a considerable age-related variation in importance of specific types of medication.

conclusionA machine-learning model using preoperative characteristics and prescriptions slightly improved identification of patients in high-risk of "medical" complications after fast-track THA and TKA compared to a logistic regression model. Such algorithms could help find a manageable population of patients who may benefit most from intensified perioperative care.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCohort StudiesHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMorbidityEnhanced recovery after surgeryHip replacementKnee replacementMachine learningPerioperative carePostoperative complicationsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID38030979
PMCPMC10685559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.