Trial reportCNS drugs2024
Thrombolysis with Recombinant Human Prourokinase 4.5-6 h After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase IIa, Randomized, and Open-Label Multicenter Clinical Trial.
Trial report in CNS drugs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of 35 mg of recombinant human prourokinase for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Prourokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5 h: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Adjuvant therapy with total salvianolic acid injection enhances the safety and efficacy of recombinant prourokinase in ischemic stroke by mitigating blood-brain barrier disruption.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Where are we going for the treatment in ischaemic stroke: a comprehensive study of investigator-sponsored randomised controlled trials, 1990-2024.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Observational
- Exploring the efficacy of recombinant human pro-urokinase in catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Updates in Intravenous Thrombolysis Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Asian Populations.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Clinical research progress on pathogenesis and treatment of Patent Foramen Ovale-associated stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIschemic stroke is a major cause of disability and death worldwide. A narrow therapeutic window profoundly constrained the utilization of alteplase.
objectivesTo investigate therapeutic effects and safety of intravenous recombinant human prourokinase (rhPro-UK) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the 4.5-6 h therapeutic time windows.
methodsWe conducted a phase IIa, randomized, and open-label multicenter clinical trial. Between 4.5 and 6 h after the onset of AIS, patients were randomly administrated to receive intravenous rhPro-UK at a 50 mg or 35 mg dose. The primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 1 or less at 90 days. The secondary outcome was the treatment response, which was based on an at least 4-point improvement from baseline National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score at 24 h after drug administration. Safety endpoints included death, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and other serious adverse events.
resultsWe enrolled 80 patients in the 4.5-6 h therapeutic time windows at 17 medical centers in China from December 2016 to November 2017. A total of 39 patients were treated with 50 mg rhPro-UK, and 39 were treated with 35 mg rhPro-UK. Compared with the baseline, the NIHSS score at 24 h and days 7, 14, 30, and 90 was decreased significantly among patients treated with either rhPro-UK 50 mg or 35 mg. The mean reduction in the NIHSS from baseline to 90 days after the onset was 3.56 and 5.79 in the rhPro-UK 50 mg group and the rhPro-UK 35 mg group, respectively. The rates of functional independence at 90 days of rhPro-UK 50 mg and 35 mg were 61.54% and 69.23%, respectively (P = 0.475), and the proportion of patients with functional response to treatment at 24 h were 28.21% and 33.33% (P = 0.624). No sICH occurred in the two groups, and death occurred in only one patient in the rhPro-UK 50 mg group. There was no significant difference in mortality at 90 days and the rate of other serious adverse events between two groups.
conclusionIn the 4.5-6 h time window, more than 60% of patients at either dose of rhPro-UK (50 mg or 35 mg) achieved functional independence at 90 days without increased mortality and sICH risk. Thus, intravenous rhPro-UK was effective and safe for patients with AIS within 4.5-6 h after stroke onset. While no significant differences were identified between different dosages of rhPro-UK regarding clinical outcomes, it is a logical step to further test the safety and efficacy of the low dose of rhPro-UK in a well-powered phase III study.
trial registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn . Identifier: ChiCTR1800016519. Date of registration: 6 June 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.