ArticleMolecular psychiatry2024
Molecular consequences of PQBP1 deficiency, involved in the X-linked Renpenning syndrome.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disrupted PQBP1-HNRNPU-LINE-1 axis underlies aberrant neurodevelopment in renpenning syndrome.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- PQBP1-dependent alternative RNA splicing underlies high calorie diet-induced cognitive impairment.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- DYRK1A roles in human neural progenitors.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutations in the PQBP1 gene (polyglutamine-binding protein-1) are responsible for a syndromic X-linked form of neurodevelopmental disorder (XL-NDD) with intellectual disability (ID), named Renpenning syndrome. PQBP1 encodes a protein involved in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. To investigate the consequences of PQBP1 loss, we used RNA interference to knock-down (KD) PQBP1 in human neural stem cells (hNSC). We observed a decrease of cell proliferation, as well as the deregulation of the expression of 58 genes, comprising genes encoding proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases, playing a role in mRNA regulation or involved in innate immunity. We also observed an enrichment of genes involved in other forms of NDD (CELF2, APC2, etc). In particular, we identified an increase of a non-canonical isoform of another XL-NDD gene, UPF3B, an actor of nonsense mRNA mediated decay (NMD). This isoform encodes a shorter protein (UPF3B_S) deprived from the domains binding NMD effectors, however no notable change in NMD was observed after PQBP1-KD in fibroblasts containing a premature termination codon. We showed that short non-canonical and long canonical UPF3B isoforms have different interactomes, suggesting they could play distinct roles. The link between PQBP1 loss and increase of UPF3B_S expression was confirmed in mRNA obtained from patients with pathogenic variants in PQBP1, particularly pronounced for truncating variants and missense variants located in the C-terminal domain. We therefore used it as a molecular marker of Renpenning syndrome, to test the pathogenicity of variants of uncertain clinical significance identified in PQPB1 in individuals with NDD, using patient blood mRNA and HeLa cells expressing wild-type or mutant PQBP1 cDNA. We showed that these different approaches were efficient to prove a functional effect of variants in the C-terminal domain of the protein. In conclusion, our study provided information on the pathological mechanisms involved in Renpenning syndrome, but also allowed the identification of a biomarker of PQBP1 deficiency useful to test variant effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.