Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38030778›Full record

ArticleNature2023

Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas.

Yiling Lin, Carl Benedikt Frey, Lingfei Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI raises the productivity bar.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiling LinSchool of Computing and Information, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Carl Benedikt FreyOxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. carl.frey@oii.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-6293
Lingfei WuSchool of Computing and Information, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. liw105@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of innovation emphasize the role of social networks and teams as facilitators of breakthrough discoveries

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationInternational CooperationInventionsPatents as TopicResearch ReportCooperative BehaviorDatasets as TopicGroup ProcessesKnowledgeSocial Networking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.