ArticleScientific reports2023
Breathing sounds analysis system for early detection of airway problems in patients with a tracheostomy tube.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Tracheostomy in the Digital Age: How Artificial Intelligence and Immersive Technologies Are Redefining Airway Care.Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2025Article
- Parallel Datasets for Classification of Respiratory Rhythm Phases.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Effect of Subglottic Stenosis on Expiratory Sound Using Direct Noise Calculation.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To prevent immediate mortality in patients with a tracheostomy tube, it is essential to ensure timely suctioning or replacement of the tube. Breathing sounds at the entrance of tracheostomy tubes were recorded with a microphone and analyzed using a spectrogram to detect airway problems. The sounds were classified into three categories based on the waveform of the spectrogram according to the obstacle status: normal breathing sounds (NS), vibrant breathing sounds (VS) caused by movable obstacles, and sharp breathing sounds (SS) caused by fixed obstacles. A total of 3950 breathing sounds from 23 patients were analyzed. Despite neither the patients nor the medical staff recognizing any airway problems, the number and percentage of NS, VS, and SS were 1449 (36.7%), 1313 (33.2%), and 1188 (30.1%), respectively. Artificial intelligence (AI) was utilized to automatically classify breathing sounds. MobileNet and Inception_v3 exhibited the highest sensitivity and specificity scores of 0.9441 and 0.9414, respectively. When classifying into three categories, ResNet_50 showed the highest accuracy of 0.9027, and AlexNet showed the highest accuracy of 0.9660 in abnormal sounds. Classifying breathing sounds into three categories is very useful in deciding whether to suction or change the tracheostomy tubes, and AI can accomplish this with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.