Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38030251›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

REstrictive versus StandarD FlUid Management in Mechanically Ventilated ChildrEn Admitted to PICU: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial (REDUCE-1).

Sainath Raman, Sarfaraz Rahiman, Melanie Kennedy, Adrian Mattke, Prem Venugopal, Craig McBride, Quyen Tu, Florian Zapf, Eva Kuhlwein, Jemma Woodgate and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. REstrictive versus StandarD FlUid Management in Mechanically Ventilated ChildrEn Admitted to PICU: a pilot randomized controlled trial (REDUCE-1).Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sainath RamanChildren's Intensive Care Research Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia sainath.raman@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0152-9980
Sarfaraz RahimanPaediatric Intensive Care, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7716-2919
Melanie KennedyQueensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Adrian MattkePaediatric Intensive Care, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Prem VenugopalDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Craig McBrideGeneral Surgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Quyen TuDepartment of Pharmacy, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Florian ZapfDepartment of Intensive Care and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eva KuhlweinDepartment of Intensive Care and Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jemma WoodgateDepartment of Dietetics, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Puneet SinghPaediatric Intensive Care, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Luregn J SchlapbachChildren's Intensive Care Research Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kristen S GibbonsChildren's Intensive Care Research Program, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-0932
The University of Queensland · AUChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CHSydney Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntravenous fluid therapy is the most common intervention in critically ill children. There is an increasing body of evidence questioning the safety of high-volume intravenous fluid administration in these patients. To date, the optimal fluid management strategy remains unclear. We aimed to test the feasibility of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing a restrictive with a standard (liberal) fluid management strategy in critically ill children. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, binational pilot, randomised, controlled, open-label, pragmatic trial. Patients <18 years admitted to paediatric intensive care unit and mechanically ventilated at the time of screening are eligible. Patients with tumour lysis syndrome, diabetic ketoacidosis or postorgan transplant are excluded.

interventions1:1 random assignment of 154 individual patients into two groups-restrictive versus standard, liberal, fluid strategy-stratified by primary diagnosis (cardiac/non-cardiac). The intervention consists of a restrictive fluid bundle, including lower maintenance fluid allowance, limiting fluid boluses, reducing volumes of drug delivery and initiating diuretics or peritoneal dialysis earlier. The intervention is applied for 48 hours postrandomisation or until discharge (whichever is earlier). ENDPOINTS: The number of patients recruited per month and proportion of recruited to eligible patients are feasibility endpoints. New-onset acute kidney injury and the incidence of clinically relevant central venous thrombosis are safety endpoints. Fluid balance at 48 hours after randomisation is the efficacy endpoint. Survival free of paediatric intensive care censored at 28 days is the clinical endpoint. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was gained from the Children's Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/21/QCHQ/77514, date: 1 September 2021), and University of Zurich (2021-02447, date: 17 March 2023). The trial is registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001311842). Open-access publication in high impact peer-reviewed journals will be sought. Modern information dissemination strategies will also be used including social media to disseminate the outcomes of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001311842. PROTOCOL VERSION/DATE: V5/23 May 2023.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2clinical trialsfeasibility studiespaediatric intensive & critical carerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38030251
PMCPMC10689381
OpenAlexW4389132219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.