Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38030126›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2024

Effects of microbial agent and microbial fertilizer input on soil microbial community structure and diversity in a peanut continuous cropping system.

Taswar Ahsan, Pei-Cong Tian, Jie Gao, Chen Wang, Chuang Liu, Yu-Qian Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of Quality Differences inFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Continuous cropping of lavender (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The IAA-Producing RhizobacteriumPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Taswar AhsanCollege of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China; College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, Liaoning, China.
Pei-Cong TianCollege of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, Liaoning, China.
Jie GaoCollege of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110866, Liaoning, China.
Chen WangCollege of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China.
Chuang LiuCollege of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China.
Yu-Qian HuangCollege of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China. Electronic address: 15520171695@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe soil harbors a diverse array of microorganisms, and these are essential components of terrestrial ecosystems. The presence of microorganisms in the soil, particularly in the rhizosphere, is closely linked to plant growth and soil fertility.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study is to assess the potential advantages of integrating microbial inoculants with compound fertilizer in enhancing peanut yield.

methodsWe utilized Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology to conduct our investigation. The experimental design consists of four treatment groups: compound fertilizers (CF), compound fertilizers supplemented with microbial agents (CF + MA), compound fertilizers supplemented with microbial fertilizers (CF + MF), and compound fertilizers supplemented with both microbial agents and microbial fertilizers (CF + MM).

resultsThe experimental results demonstrated a significant increase in peanut yield upon application of CF + MA, CF + MF, and CF + MM treatments. During the blossom stage and pod-setting stage, the soil's catalase, urease, and acid phosphatase activities were significantly increased in the CF + MA, and CF + MM treatments compared to the CF treatment. The application of CF + MA resulted in an increase in bacterial richness in the rhizosphere soil of peanuts, as indicated by the sequencing results. The application of CF + MA, CF + MF, and CF + MM resulted in a reduction of fungal diversity. Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla, while Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the dominant phyla in the fungal component of the rhizosphere soil microbiome across all experimental treatments.

conclusionMicrobial agents and fertilizers modify the peanut rhizosphere soil's microbial community structure, as per our findings. The abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria (Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium, and Burkholderia) and fungi (Trichoderma and Cladophialophora) could increase, while pathogenic fungi (Penicillium and Fusarium) decreased, thereby significantly promoting plant growth and yield of peanut.

Indexed as

ArachisFertilizersMicrobiotaRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologyAgricultureBacteriaBiodiversityCrop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingFertilizersSoilIllumina MiSeqPeanut yieldRhizosphere microbiomeSoil enzyme

Identifiers

PMID38030126
PMCPMC11464484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.