ArticleMedical image analysis2024
Riemannian frameworks for the harmonization of resting-state functional MRI scans.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Connectome Predicts Cognition and Links White Matter Hyperintensity Burden to Cognitive Impairment Across the Vascular Cognitive Impairment Continuum.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Riemannian geometry meets fMRI: the advantages of modeling correlation manifolds and eigenvector subspaces.Research square · 2026Article
- Derivation of machine learning brain aging biomarkers for a set of forty thousand functional connectomes.Brain research bulletin · 2026Article
- Scalable geometric learning with correlation-based functional brain networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging provides unprecedented images of the brain. Unfortunately, scanners and acquisition protocols can significantly impact MRI scans. The development of statistical methods able to reduce this variability without altering the relevant information in the scans, often coined harmonization methods, has been the topic of an increasing research effort supported by the recent growth of publicly available neuroimaging data sets and new possibilities for combining them to achieve greater statistical power. In this work, we focus on the challenges specifically raised by the harmonization of resting-state functional MRI scans. We propose to harmonize resting-state fMRI scans by reducing the impact of covariates such as scanner differences and scanning protocols on their associated functional connectomes and then propagating the changes back to the rs-fMRI time series. We use Riemannian geometric frameworks to preserve the mathematical properties of functional connectomes during their harmonization, and we demonstrate how state-of-the-art harmonization methods can be embedded within these frameworks to reduce covariates effects while preserving the relevant clinical information associated with aging or brain disorders. During our experiments, a large set of synthetic data was generated and processed to compare eighty variants of the proposed approach. The framework achieving the best harmonization was then applied to three low-dimensional data sets made of 712 sets of fMRI time series provided by the ABIDE consortium and two high-dimensional data sets obtained by processing 1527 rs-fMRI scans provided by the Human Connectome Project, the Framingham Heart Study and the Genetics of Brain Structure and Function study. These experiments established that our new framework could successfully harmonize low-dimensional connectomes and voxelwise functional time series and confirmed the need for preserving connectomes properties during their harmonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.