Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38029299›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2024

StigmaBeat: Collaborating With Rural Young People to Co-Design Films Aimed at Reducing Mental Health Stigma.

Rochelle Hine, Brenda Gladstone, Andrea Reupert, Lotti O'Dea, Rose Cuff, Scott Yates, Anneli Silvén Hagström, Violette McGaw, Kim Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-Designing Wellbeing Initiatives With Rural Adolescents: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rochelle HineMonash Rural Health, Monash University, Warragul, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4399-0414
Brenda GladstoneDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrea ReupertSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Monash University, Warragul, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1447-7769
Lotti O'DeaIndependent Consultant, Naarm/Collingwood, VIC, Australia.
Rose CuffSatellite Foundation, Naarm/Collingwood, VIC, Australia.
Scott YatesSchool of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Anneli Silvén HagströmDepartment of Social Work, Stockholm University, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-3576
Violette McGawLifespan Psychology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Kim FosterSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the experience and impact of intersectional stigma experienced by rural young people (15-25 years) who have a parent with mental health challenges. The StigmaBeat project employed a co-design approach to create short films to identify and challenge mental health stigma from the perspective of young people who have experienced this phenomenon. The aim of this paper is to describe the co-design methodological approach used in StigmaBeat, as an example of a novel participatory project. We describe one way that co-design can be employed by researchers in collaboration with marginalised young people to produce films aimed at reducing mental health stigma in the community. Through describing the processes undertaken in this project, the opportunities, challenges, and tensions of combining community development methods with research methods will be explored. Co-design with young people is a dynamic and engaging method of collaborative research practice capable of harnessing lived experience expertise to intervene in social issues and redesign or redevelop health services and policies. The participatory approach involved trusting and implementing the suggestions of young people in designing and developing the films and involved creating the physical and social environment to enable this, including embedding creativity, a critical element to the project's methodological success. Intensive time and resource investment are needed to engage a population that is often marginalised in relation to stigma discourse.

Indexed as

Motion PicturesRural PopulationSocial StigmaAdolescentAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthYoung Adultco-designfilmmakingmental healthparental mental illnessparticipatory researchrural healthstigmayouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID38029299
PMCPMC11080393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.