ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2023
The use of ChatGPT in occupational medicine: opportunities and threats.
Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Accuracy of ChatGPT in Answering Questions About Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Current Status of ChatGPT Use in Medical Education: Potentials, Challenges, and Strategies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Regulatory and Ethical Considerations on Artificial Intelligence for Occupational Medicine.La Medicina del lavoro · 2024Article
- ChatGPT in Occupational Medicine: A Comparative Study with Human Experts.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Correspondence on "The use of ChatGPT in occupational medicine: opportunities and threats".Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ChatGPT has the potential to revolutionize occupational medicine by providing a powerful tool for analyzing data, improving communication, and increasing efficiency. It can help identify patterns and trends in workplace health and safety, act as a virtual assistant for workers, employers, and occupational health professionals, and automate certain tasks. However, caution is required due to ethical concerns, the need to maintain confidentiality, and the risk of inconsistent or inaccurate results. ChatGPT cannot replace the crucial role of the occupational health professional in the medical surveillance of workers and the analysis of data on workers' health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.