Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38029213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Collaborative cytometric inter-laboratory ring test for probiotics quantification.

Peter Lüttge Jordal, Marcos González Diaz, Carlotta Morazzoni, Serena Allesina, Daniele Zogno, Daniela Cattivelli, Serena Galletti, Elena Guidesi, Jean-Pol Warzée, Marco Pane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter Lüttge JordalSBT Instruments A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Marcos González DiazSBT Instruments A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Carlotta MorazzoniProbiotical Research, Novara, Italy.
Serena AllesinaProbiotical Research, Novara, Italy.
Daniele ZognoProbiotical Research, Novara, Italy.
Daniela CattivelliAAT - Advanced Analytical Technologies, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Serena GallettiAAT - Advanced Analytical Technologies, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Elena GuidesiAAT - Advanced Analytical Technologies, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, Italy.
Jean-Pol WarzéeEuropean Scientific League for Probiotics, Brussels, Belgium.
Marco PaneProbiotical Research, Novara, Italy.
Probiotical (Italy) · ITAdvanced Materials and Technologies (Slovenia) · SIEuropean CanCer Organisation · BEQuantum Science and Technology in Arcetri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. From this definition, accurate enumeration of probiotic products is a necessity. Nonetheless, this definition does not specify the methods for assessing such viability. Colony forming units is the Methods: Herein we present the results of a collaborative inter-laboratory ring test for cytometric bacterial quantification. Specifically, membrane integrity fluorescence flow cytometry (FFC) method and the newer impedance flow cytometry (IFC) method have been used. Both methods interrogate single cells in solution for the presence of intact membranes. FFC exploits fluorochromes that reflect the presence or absence of an intact membrane. IFC probes membrane integrity in a label-free approach by detecting membrane-induced hindrances to the propagation of electricity. Results: A performance ring-test and comparison design on the FFC method showed that the method is robust against the exchange of equipment, procedures, materials, and operators. After initial method optimization with assessments of rehydration medium, wake-up duration, and phase shift gating on the individual strains, the IFC method showed good agreement with the FFC results. Specifically, we tested 6 distinct species of probiotic bacteria (3 Discussion: Together, these results demonstrate that flow cytometry is a reliable, precise, and user-friendly culture-independent method for bacterial enumeration.

Indexed as

culture-independentdormantelectrical impedance spectroscopy flow cytometry (EIS-FC)fluorescence flow cytometryimpedance flow cytometryprobioticsviable but non-culturable

Identifiers

PMID38029213
PMCPMC10667725
OpenAlexW4388631578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.