ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
The analysis of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the probiotic potential of a healthy human vaginal flora, Lactobacillus gasseri K9: genomic and in vitro aspects.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Distribution of lactic acid bacteria in vaginal samples from Cameroonian women.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Population‑Specific Diversity of Dominant VaginalInternational journal of women's health · 2026Article
- The Effect of Cell-Free Metabolites of Vaginal Lactobacilli on HeLa Cells Is Independent of Lactic Acid Concentration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Understanding the vaginal microbiome among women with different genotypes of human papillomavirus infection in remote Andaman islands.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- An insight into the vaginal microbiome of infertile women in Bangladesh using metagenomic approach.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A healthy vaginal microbiota is represented mainly by Methods: The study included 100 women (79 patients with abnormal cervical Pap smear results and 21 controls) from whom vaginal swabs were collected. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to determine seven lactic acid bacteria (LAB) species and their quantities. Results: Most patients were colonized by two Discussion: The degree of dysplastic changes in the endothelium or the presence of a group of atypical cervical stratified epithelial cells was not associated with significant changes in the studied vaginal bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.