Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38029011›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2023

Proton liver stereotactic body radiation therapy: Treatment techniques and dosimetry feasibility from a single institution.

Jun Zhou, Minglei Kang, Yinan Wang, Kristin A Higgins, Charles B Simone, Pretesh Patel, Mark W McDonald, Liyong Lin, Duncan Bohannon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Minglei KangNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yinan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kristin A HigginsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Charles B SimoneNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Pretesh PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark W McDonaldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Liyong LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Duncan BohannonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USNew York Proton Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the resulting dosimetry characteristics of simulation and planning techniques for proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of primary and secondary liver tumors. Methods: Consecutive patients treated under volumetric daily image guidance with liver proton SBRT between September 2019 and March 2022 at Emory Proton Therapy Center were included in this study. Prescriptions ranged from 40 Gy to 60 Gy in 3- or 5-fraction regimens, and motion management techniques were used when target motion exceeded 5 mm. 4D robust optimization was used when necessary. Dosimetry evaluation was conducted for ITV V100, D99, Dmax, and liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Thirty-six tumors from 29 patients were treated. Proton therapy for primary and secondary liver tumors using motion management techniques and robust optimization resulted in high target coverage and low doses to critical organs. The median ITV V100% was 100.0%, and the median ITV D99% was 111.3%. The median liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc were 499 cGy and 5.7 cGy, respectively. The median conformity index (CI) was 1.03, and the median R50 was 2.56. Except for ITV D99% (primary 118.1% vs. secondary 107.2%, p = 0.005), there were no significant differences in age, ITV volume, ITV V100%, ITV maximum dose, liver-ITV mean dose, or D700cc between primary and secondary tumor groups. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that proton therapy with motion management techniques and robust optimization achieves excellent target coverage with low normal liver doses for primary and secondary liver tumors. The results showed high target coverage, high conformality, and low doses to the liver.

Indexed as

conformitymotion managementprimary and secondary liver tumorProton SBRTrobust optimization

Identifiers

PMID38029011
PMCPMC10681147
OpenAlexW4389180777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.