Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38029000›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2023

Antibacterial Activity of Surfactin and Synergistic Effect with Conventional Antibiotics Against Methicillin-Resistant

Zhaoyinqian Li, Tingting Li, Jingyang Tang, Li Huang, Yinhuan Ding, Zhangrui Zeng, Jinbo Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of a Biosurfactant fromJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Surfactin-ProducingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effective Control ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhaoyinqian Li *Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Tingting Li *Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jingyang TangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Li HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yinhuan DingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhangrui ZengDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jinbo LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, People's Republic of China.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is increasing, leading to a huge financial burden and human suffering. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance is an urgent problem in the realm of clinical practice. Antimicrobial peptides are an effective and feasible strategy for combating infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro antimicrobial ability of the lipopeptide surfactin, either alone or in combination with conventional antibiotics, against the standard and clinical strains of Methods: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of surfactin on the selected strains were evaluated by a microbroth dilution technique. The growth curves of the selected strains with and without surfactin were measured, and transmission electron microscopy was used to observe the structure of surfactin-treated bacterial cells. The biofilm inhibitory abilities of surfactin were assessed by crystal violet staining. The antimicrobial interactions between surfactin and conventional antibiotics were established using a checkerboard assay, as well as determining the mutant prevention concentration. The inhibitory effect of surfactin on penicillinase was tested by iodometry. Results: The MIC and MBC values of surfactin ranged from 512 to 1024 µg/mL and 1024 to 2048 µg/mL, respectively. Moreover, surfactin significantly prevented the Conclusion: Surfactin appears to be a potential option for the treatment of DFUs infected with MRSA, as it is capable of improving antimicrobial activities and can be used alone or in combination with conventional antibiotics to prevent or postpone the emergence of resistance.

Indexed as

antimicrobial peptidesdiabetic foot ulcersmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureussurfactinsynergistic effect

Identifiers

PMID38029000
PMCPMC10674630
OpenAlexW4388813758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.