Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38028955›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023

Dose Escalation of Biologics in Biologic-Naïve Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Outcomes From the ODESSA-UC Study.

Sabyasachi Ghosh, Niranjan Kathe, Kandavadivu Umashankar, Kirti Mirchandani, Arunima Hait, Riyanka Paul, Ninfa Candela, Tao Fan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biologic dose escalation in inflammatory bowel disease in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Raising the bar in ulcerative colitis management.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabyasachi GhoshTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Niranjan KatheComplete HEOR Solutions, Chalfont, PA, USA.
Kandavadivu UmashankarTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Kirti MirchandaniComplete HEOR Solutions, Chalfont, PA, USA.
Arunima HaitComplete HEOR Solutions, Chalfont, PA, USA.
Riyanka PaulComplete HEOR Solutions, Chalfont, PA, USA.
Ninfa CandelaTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Tao FanTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9318-9452
Takeda (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dose escalation of biologics may regain treatment response in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, dose escalation rates and associated outcomes and costs are not well characterized in biologic-naïve patients receiving antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) treatments, such as infliximab or adalimumab or vedolizumab. Methods: ODESSA-UC, a retrospective cohort study investigating dose escalation in patients with UC who had received first-line biologics, used data from IBM MarketScan databases. Adults with UC and ≥1 claim for an index drug (adalimumab, infliximab, or vedolizumab) were eligible. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the adjusted rate of dose escalation. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of experiencing adverse outcomes (corticosteroid use, infection, sepsis, or inflammatory bowel disease-related hospitalization) and incurring index drug costs. Results: A year after the start of maintenance, a lower proportion of patients experienced dose escalation with vedolizumab (22.3%) than adalimumab (43.0%). The dose escalation risk was significantly higher for infliximab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.894; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.486-2.413) and adalimumab (HR, 2.120; 95% CI, 1.680-2.675) than for vedolizumab. The odds of experiencing an adverse outcome after dose escalation were higher for anti-TNF-α treatments than for vedolizumab (odds ratio, 2.052; 95% CI, 1.200-3.507). Index drug costs after dose escalation were lowest for vedolizumab. Conclusions: Patients with UC receiving vedolizumab had a lower risk of dose escalation and lower subsequent costs than patients receiving anti-TNF-α treatments. Our study demonstrates the possible clinical and economic implications of dose escalation.

Indexed as

biologic-naïvebiologicsdose escalationulcerative colitisvedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID38028955
PMCPMC10653026
OpenAlexW4388737518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.