Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38028932›Full record

ReviewShoulder & elbow2023

Surgical treatment options for articular cartilage defects of the glenohumeral joint: A systematic review.

Danielle Dagher, Asher Selznick, Carlos Prada, Yasser Al Shehab, Timothy Leroux, Moin Khan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle DagherBachelor of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Asher SelznickMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9382-1606
Carlos PradaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0088-1859
Yasser Al ShehabDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Timothy LerouxDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Moin KhanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-8095
McMaster University · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAImpact · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many joint-preserving surgical interventions for cartilage defects of the knee have been adapted for use in the shoulder; however, there still exists no clear consensus for treatment. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes of different interventions in patients with focal chondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Medline. Patients who underwent a joint-preserving surgical procedure to treat a focal chondral defect of the glenoid, humeral head or both were included. Patients treated for diffuse cartilage defects or with shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Results: Ten studies were included, with follow-up data available for 194 shoulders. Eight joint-preserving procedures were evaluated, with microfracture being the most common. One study evaluating microfracture reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at short-term and long-term follow-up compared to preoperative scores. Across all studies, 32 patients underwent subsequent shoulder surgery, with 22 being arthroplasties. Conclusions: We found improvements in patient-reported and functional outcomes across all studies. Although joint-preserving procedures have shown reasonable outcomes for focal chondral defects of the glenohumeral joint, long-term outcomes remain unknown, and the progression of osteoarthritis remains a concern. Higher quality evidence is required to make definitive recommendations. Level of Evidence: IV.

Indexed as

cartilagechondral defectGlenohumeraljoint-preservingsurgery

Identifiers

PMID38028932
PMCPMC10656978
OpenAlexW4311495716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.