Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38028649›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2023

Functional analysis of

Brennan Hyden, Dana L Carper, Paul E Abraham, Guoliang Yuan, Tao Yao, Leo Baumgart, Yu Zhang, Cindy Chen, Ronan O'Malley, Jin-Gui Chen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional analysis ofPlant direct · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brennan HydenHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University, Cornell AgriTech Geneva New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4896-0030
Dana L CarperBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-8054
Paul E AbrahamBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-9123
Guoliang YuanBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-8769
Tao YaoBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-0731
Leo BaumgartLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Berkeley California USA.
Yu ZhangLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4495-3447
Cindy ChenLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7539-103X
Ronan O'MalleyLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-0339
Jin-Gui ChenBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-4201
Xiaohan YangBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-4210
Robert L HettichBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7708-786X
Gerald A TuskanBiosciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-1289
Lawrence B SmartHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University, Cornell AgriTech Geneva New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-7736
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Salicaceae family is of growing interest in the study of dioecy in plants because the sex determination region (SDR) has been shown to be highly dynamic, with differing locations and heterogametic systems between species. Without the ability to transform and regenerate

Indexed as

ArabidopsisdioecyproteomicsSalixsex determinationtransgenicswillow

Identifiers

PMID38028649
PMCPMC10651977
OpenAlexW4388735672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.