ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2023
Evaluating the Utility of a Near-Peer Situation-Based Course to Prepare Medical Students for the UK Foundation Programme: A Pilot Study.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prepare medical graduates for residency through near-peer teaching: addressing reciprocal determinants.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- The value of a peer-to-peer teaching community in medical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing medical students' understanding of end-of-life care ethics and law through video-triggered expert-led debriefing: a two-stage study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Starting the Foundation Programme can be challenging for many medical graduates, as medical school alone may not adequately prepare them for complex tasks like managing comorbidities or emergencies. Growing evidence supports the role of transition interventions to meet this knowledge gap, however data on the utility of situation-based learning are limited. This pilot study aimed to assess the efficacy of a near-peer case-based course in improving knowledge and preparedness for foundation training in recent medical graduates. Methods: Recent Imperial College graduates who attended a "Junior Doctor on Call" course were eligible for inclusion. This transition intervention, designed and delivered by a Foundation Year 1 doctor, covered six patient cases that integrated high-yield clinical concepts and practical tips. An online questionnaire was distributed one week before and after the course to assess perceptions of knowledge, confidence, and preparedness for training. Participants were also invited to attend an online semi-structured after the course. Results: Out of 19 attendees, 17 (89.5% response rate) completed the pre-course questionnaire, 14 (73.7% response rate) completed the post-course questionnaire, and 3 completed the interview. 68.75% (n=11) had not previously attended a preparatory course for foundation training. Results demonstrated that 85.7% of participants felt more knowledgeable than before in the key topics covered. Participants also demonstrated an increase in self-rated confidence in commencing work as a junior doctor following the course, with 92.9% of participants stating that they felt more confident. Conclusion: This study offers support for short-term situation-based courses in enhancing medical students' knowledge and confidence for foundation training. These findings add to the growing evidence-base encouraging implementation of short-term courses in preparing for practice. However, further research on the utility of such transition interventions is critical to inform the development of evidence-based recommendations for recent medical graduates, educators, and programme directors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.