Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38028121›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2023

High Levels of Satisfaction Among Hearing Aid Users in a Pilot Study for Sustainable Low-Cost Auditory Rehabilitation Services in Samoa.

Annette Kaspar, John Newall, Sione Pifeleti, Galumalemana Hunkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Annette KasparENT Department, Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital, Ministry of Health, Moto'otua, Samoa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-3236
John NewallLinguistics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sione PifeletiENT Department, Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital, Ministry of Health, Moto'otua, Samoa.
Galumalemana HunkinCentre for Samoan Studies, National University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa.
Ministry of Health · LAMacquarie University · AUNational University of Samoa · WS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of locally sustainable hearing aid device services is desirable in the Pacific Islands. The aim of the present study was (1) To assess the suitability of low-cost pre-programmable hearing aids in Samoa, a Polynesian nation of the Pacific Islands, and (2) To develop translations of established auditory rehabilitation questionnaires into the FaaSamoan language for clinical, public health, and research applications. A cross-over trial of 2 low-cost pre-programmable hearing aids among 20 adults in Samoa was conducted as part of a larger UN-funded global audiology study. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids, the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids for Significant Others, and the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory questionnaires were translated into the FaaSamoan language to assess the self-reported outcomes of study participants. Overall, high scores were measured for the self-reported outcome measures, suggesting good levels of use and satisfaction with the hearing aid devices. Overall, results found that once a hearing aid was fitted that 67.6% of participants reported no hearing handicap, 32.4% reported a mild to moderate hearing handicap, and no participant reported a significant hearing handicap.

Indexed as

adultscapacity-developmenthearing aidshearing impairmentPacific Islandssustainability

Identifiers

PMID38028121
PMCPMC10655641
OpenAlexW4388709135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.